Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

First eye prediction error improves second eye refractive outcome results in 2129 patients after bilateral sequential cataract surgery.

Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL.

Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

PMID:
21762991
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Use of fellow eye data in the calculation of intraocular lens power for the second eye.

Olsen T.

Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.030. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

PMID:
21723613
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Intraocular lens power selection in the second eye of patients undergoing bilateral, sequential cataract extraction.

Covert DJ, Henry CR, Koenig SB.

Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Oct 7.

PMID:
19815281
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

A comparative analysis of intraocular lens power calculation methods after myopic excimer laser surgery.

Fam HB, Lim KL.

J Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;24(4):355-60.

PMID:
18500084
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Intraocular lens power in bilateral cataract surgery: whether adjusting for error of predicted refraction in the first eye improves prediction in the second eye.

Jabbour J, Irwig L, Macaskill P, Hennessy MP.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2091-7.

PMID:
17137989
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial length <22.00 mm.

Day AC, Foster PJ, Stevens JD.

Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;40(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02810.x. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

PMID:
22594574
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.

Filkorn T, Kovács I, Takács A, Horváth E, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;28(8):540-4. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120703-04. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

PMID:
22785062
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Improving the second-eye refractive error in patients undergoing bilateral sequential cataract surgery.

Jivrajka RV, Shammas MC, Shammas HJ.

Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1097-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

PMID:
22385971
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula.

Fenzl RE, Gills JP, Cherchio M.

Ophthalmology. 1998 Sep;105(9):1759-64.

PMID:
9754188
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Improved refractive outcome for ciliary sulcus-implanted intraocular lenses.

Dubey R, Birchall W, Grigg J.

Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb;119(2):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.050. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22196976
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK.

Wang L, Booth MA, Koch DD.

Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct;111(10):1825-31.

PMID:
15465542
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

de Sanctis U, Damiani F, Brusasco L, Grignolo F.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;156(2):254-259.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.004.

PMID:
23870359
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Use of corneal power-specific constants to improve the accuracy of the SRK/T formula.

Eom Y, Kang SY, Song JS, Kim HM.

Ophthalmology. 2013 Mar;120(3):477-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.008. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

PMID:
23352197
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 173 eyes.

McCarthy M, Gavanski GM, Paton KE, Holland SP.

Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):940-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.048. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

PMID:
21131054
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.

Chang SW, Yu CY, Chen DP.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.035. Epub 2009 May 8.

PMID:
19427697
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation.

Fam HB, Lim KL.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):678-83. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.148452. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

PMID:
19168467
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.

Wang JK, Hu CY, Chang SW.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.017.

PMID:
18242451
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes.

Roh YR, Lee SM, Han YK, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH.

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;25(3):151-5. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151. Epub 2011 May 24.

PMID:
21655038
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

Optimized constants for an ultraviolet light-adjustable intraocular lens.

Conrad-Hengerer I, Dick HB, Hütz WW, Haigis W, Hengerer FH.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Dec;37(12):2101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.023.

PMID:
22108105
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization.

Nemeth G, Nagy A, Berta A, Modis L Jr.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;250(9):1321-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2013-9. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

PMID:
22527318
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk