Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 247

1.

Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

Subramaniam A, Kim KH, Bryant SA, Kimball KJ, Huh WK, Straughn JM, Estes JM, Alvarez RD.

Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Oct;123(1):54-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

PMID:
21742372
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.

Biffi R, Corrado F, de Braud F, de Lucia F, Scarpa D, Testori A, Orsi F, Bellomi M, Mauri S, Aapro M, Andreoni B.

Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1190-4.

PMID:
9301441
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.

Dillon PA, Foglia RP.

J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Sep;41(9):1582-7.

PMID:
16952595
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.

Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Mauri S, Goldhirsch A, Nolè F, Andreoni B.

Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73.

PMID:
9739444
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Complications of indwelling venous access devices in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Estes JM, Rocconi R, Straughn JM, Bhoola S, Leath CA, Alvarez RD, Kilgore LC, Huh WK.

Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Dec;91(3):591-5.

PMID:
14675682
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy.

Ng F, Mastoroudes H, Paul E, Davies N, Tibballs J, Hochhauser D, Mayer A, Begent R, Meyer T.

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007 Sep;19(7):551-6. Epub 2007 May 22.

PMID:
17517500
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.

Gleeson NC, Fiorica JV, Mark JE, Pinelli DM, Hoffman MS, Roberts WS, Cavanagh D.

Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Dec;51(3):372-6.

PMID:
8112648
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Totally implantable ports connected to valved catheters for chemotherapy: experience from 350 Groshong devices.

Nishinari K, Wolosker N, Bernardi CV, Yazbek G.

J Vasc Access. 2010 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22.

PMID:
20119917
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Cohn DE, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Farrell M, Awantang R, Herzog TJ.

Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Dec;83(3):533-6.

PMID:
11733967
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Comparison of a totally implantable access device for chemotherapy (Port-A-Cath) and long-term percutaneous catheterization (Broviac).

Greene FL, Moore W, Strickland G, McFarland J.

South Med J. 1988 May;81(5):580-3.

PMID:
3368808
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients.

Biffi R, De Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Arnaldi P, Goldhirsch A, Rotmensz N, Robertson C, Bellomi M, Andreoni B.

Cancer. 2001 Sep 1;92(5):1204-12.

PMID:
11571734
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.

Nosher JL, Bodner LJ, Ettinger LJ, Siegel RL, Gribbin C, Asch J, Drachtman RA.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. Epub 2001 Nov 8.

PMID:
11907746
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Catheter fracture and embolization associated with arm implantation of the cook vital port.

Burbridge B, Stoneham G, Szkup P, Otani R, Kriegler S.

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013 Aug;64(3):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Aug 4.

PMID:
22867962
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.

Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Patel KM, Siegel RL, Biswal R, Gribbin CE, Tokarz R.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):187-93.

PMID:
10821892
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.

Koonings PP, Given FT Jr.

J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Feb;178(2):164-6.

PMID:
8173727
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.

Hills JR, Cardella JF, Cardella K, Waybill PN.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;8(6):983-9.

PMID:
9399467
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Cunningham MJ, Collins MB, Kredentser DC, Malfetano JH.

Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Mar;60(3):397-9.

PMID:
8774645
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Outpatient implantation of a central venous access system in gynecologic oncology patients.

Shen-Gunther J, Mannel RS, Walker JL, Gold MA, Johnson GA.

J Reprod Med. 2003 Nov;48(11):875-81.

PMID:
14686020
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

The mechanisms of failure of totally implantable central venous access system: analysis of 73 cases with fracture of catheter.

Lin CH, Wu HS, Chan DC, Hsieh CB, Huang MH, Yu JC.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;36(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Aug 25.

PMID:
19709847
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Implantable catheter system for long-term intravenous chemotherapy.

Hall P, Cedermark B, Swedenborg J.

J Surg Oncol. 1989 May;41(1):39-41.

PMID:
2716332
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk