Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.

Salim R, Zafran N, Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kraiem N, Shalev E.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):79-86. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7.

PMID:
21691166
2.

Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel.

Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O'Neill MJ, McChlery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE.

BJOG. 2009 Oct;116(11):1443-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x. Epub 2009 Jul 28. Erratum in: BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):521. McCleery, S [corrected to McChlery, S].

3.

Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.

Mei-Dan E, Walfisch A, Suarez-Easton S, Hallak M.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;25(6):723-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.591459. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

PMID:
21806490
4.

Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Lin MG, Reid KJ, Treaster MR, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Lu GC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):558-65.

PMID:
17766600
5.

Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters.

Mei-Dan E, Walfisch A, Valencia C, Hallak M.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1765-70. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.879704. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

PMID:
24397244
6.

Mechanical labor induction in the obese population: a secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

Anabusi S, Mei-Dan E, Hallak M, Walfisch A.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):75-80. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3765-3. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

PMID:
26054823
7.

Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.

Walfisch A, Mei-Dan E, Hallak M.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):848-53. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.935328. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

PMID:
24939630
8.

Extra-amniotic balloon for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of weighted traction versus unweighted.

Lutgendorf MA, Johnson A, Terpstra ER, Snider TC, Magann EF.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;25(6):581-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.587063. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

PMID:
21728788
9.

A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening.

Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, Ben Arie A, Brown D, Hagay ZJ.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1632-6.

PMID:
15547534
10.

Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study.

Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, Serati M, Uccella S, Arlant V, Bolis P.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):338.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

PMID:
21272849
11.

Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction.

Gelber S, Sciscione A.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):642-57. Review.

PMID:
16885669
12.

Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques.

Barrilleaux PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May WL, Morrison JC.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1124-9.

PMID:
12066084
13.
14.

Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.

Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Apr;84(4):362-7.

PMID:
15762966
15.

Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.

Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9.

PMID:
15814391
17.

A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor.

Atad J, Hallak M, Auslender R, Porat-Packer T, Zarfati D, Abramovici H.

Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):223-7.

PMID:
8559528
18.

A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction.

Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;189(4):1031-5.

PMID:
14586350
19.

Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section using the double balloon device.

Khotaba S, Volfson M, Tarazova L, Odeh M, Barenboym R, Fait V, Ophir E, Oettinger M.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Nov;80(11):1041-2.

PMID:
11703204
20.

Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study.

Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Pansky M, Caspi E, Bukovsky I, Langer R.

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;97(3):375-80.

PMID:
11239640
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk