Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 173

1.

[Comparison of Lasik with femtosecond laser versus Lasik with mechanical microkeratome: predictability of flap depth, corneal biomechanical effects and optical aberrations].

Kouassi FX, Blaizeau M, Buestel C, Schweitzer C, Gallois A, Colin J, Touboul D.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Jan;35(1):2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Jun 14. French.

PMID:
21676493
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.

Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2049-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021.

PMID:
19027558
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.

Ortiz D, Alió JL, Piñero D.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.023.

PMID:
18242446
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.

Montés-Micó R, Rodríguez-Galietero A, Alió JL.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):62-8. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

PMID:
17070593
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.

Lin MY, Chang DC, Hsu WM, Wang IJ.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;38(6):992-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.025.

PMID:
22624898
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.

Patel SV, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1482-90. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

PMID:
17350688
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, Yoon EY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1774-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.041.

PMID:
19781475
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, Garufis C, Duh YJ, Soltes CR, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):97-105.

PMID:
15721701
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser.

Salomão MQ, Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson SE.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.032.

PMID:
19781472
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.

Zhou Y, Zhang J, Tian L, Zhai C.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Mar;28(3):189-94. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120208-01.

PMID:
22373033
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.

Murakami Y, Manche EE.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1879-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

PMID:
21840682
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

von Jagow B, Kohnen T.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.013.

PMID:
19101422
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.

Muallem MS, Yoo SH, Romano AC, Marangon FB, Schiffman JC, Culbertson WW.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):2295-302.

PMID:
15519078
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months.

Tanna M, Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA.

J Refract Surg. 2009 Jul;25(7 Suppl):S668-71.

PMID:
19705541
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Effect of flap thickness on higher order wavefront aberrations induced by LASIK: a bilateral study.

Cheng ZY, He JC, Zhou XT, Chu RY.

J Refract Surg. 2008 May;24(5):524-9.

PMID:
18494346
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.

Buzzonetti L, Petrocelli G, Valente P, Tamburrelli C, Mosca L, Laborante A, Balestrazzi E.

Cornea. 2008 Feb;27(2):174-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815a50bf.

PMID:
18216572
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.

Wang Y, Li J, Liu Y, Xie L.

J Refract Surg. 2013 Aug;29(8):534-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130719-03.

PMID:
23909780
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.

Zhang Y, Chen YG, Xia YJ.

J Refract Surg. 2013 May;29(5):320-4. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130415-03.

PMID:
23659230
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Safety and effectiveness of thin-flap LASIK using a femtosecond laser and microkeratome in the correction of high myopia in Chinese patients.

Li H, Sun T, Wang M, Zhao J.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):99-106. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-05. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

PMID:
20163074
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.

Rosa AM, Neto Murta J, Quadrado MJ, Tavares C, Lobo C, Van Velze R, Castanheira-Dinis A.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):833-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.038.

PMID:
19393881
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk