Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 122

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21570617)

1.

Hemodynamic characteristics of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.

Frölich MA, Arabshahi A, Katholi C, Prasain J, Barnes S.

J Clin Anesth. 2011 May;23(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.09.006.

2.

Sedative, haemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examination: preliminary results.

Koroglu A, Demirbilek S, Teksan H, Sagir O, But AK, Ersoy MO.

Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jun;94(6):821-4. Epub 2005 Mar 11.

3.

A comparison of dexmedetomidine-midazolam with propofol for maintenance of anesthesia in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Heard C, Burrows F, Johnson K, Joshi P, Houck J, Lerman J.

Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):1832-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818874ee.

PMID:
19020127
4.
5.

Effects of implant surgery on blood pressure and heart rate during sedation with propofol and midazolam.

Ueno D, Sato J, Nejima J, Maruyama K, Kobayashi M, Iketani T, Sekiguchi R, Kawahara H.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1520-6.

PMID:
23189305
6.

A randomized, controlled trial on dexmedetomidine for providing adequate sedation and hemodynamic control for awake, diagnostic transesophageal echocardiography.

Cooper L, Candiotti K, Gallagher C, Grenier E, Arheart KL, Barron ME.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Apr;25(2):233-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

PMID:
20709569
7.

A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Koroglu A, Teksan H, Sagir O, Yucel A, Toprak HI, Ersoy OM.

Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):63-7, table of contents.

PMID:
16790627
8.

The different effects of intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation on hemodynamic and heart rate variability.

Win NN, Fukayama H, Kohase H, Umino M.

Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):97-102, table of contents.

PMID:
15976213
9.

Synergistic sedation with propofol and midazolam in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Carrasco G, Cabré L, Sobrepere G, Costa J, Molina R, Cruspinera A, Lacasa C.

Crit Care Med. 1998 May;26(5):844-51.

PMID:
9590313
10.

Dexmedetomidine or medetomidine premedication before propofol-desflurane anaesthesia in dogs.

Gómez-Villamandos RJ, Palacios C, Benítez A, Granados MM, Domínguez JM, López I, Ruiz I, Aguilera E, Santisteban JM.

J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jun;29(3):157-63.

PMID:
16669859
11.

Bispectral index-guided intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion in outpatient cataract surgery.

Apan A, Doganci N, Ergan A, Büyükkoçak U.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 May;75(5):239-44. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

12.

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam sedation and antagonism of dexmedetomidine with atipamezole.

Aho M, Erkola O, Kallio A, Scheinin H, Korttila K.

J Clin Anesth. 1993 May-Jun;5(3):194-203.

PMID:
8100428
13.

Midazolam, as a co-induction agent, has propofol sparing effects but also decreases systolic blood pressure in healthy dogs.

Hopkins A, Giuffrida M, Larenza MP.

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014 Jan;41(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/vaa.12088. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

PMID:
24118993
14.

A comparison of propofol and remifentanil for sedation and limitation of movement during periretrobulbar block.

Boezaart AP, Berry RA, Nell ML, van Dyk AL.

J Clin Anesth. 2001 Sep;13(6):422-6.

PMID:
11578885
15.

Cardiovascular effects of epinephrine under sedation with nitrous oxide, propofol, or midazolam.

Niwa H, Tanimoto A, Sugimura M, Morimoto Y, Hanamoto H.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):e1-9. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

PMID:
17138156
16.

Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on lower esophageal sphincter and gastroesophageal pressure gradient in healthy volunteers.

Turan A, Wo J, Kasuya Y, Govinda R, Akça O, Dalton JE, Sessler DI, Rauch S.

Anesthesiology. 2010 Jan;112(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000365963.97138.54.

PMID:
20032699
17.

Safety and efficacy of prolonged dexmedetomidine use in critically ill children with heart disease*.

Gupta P, Whiteside W, Sabati A, Tesoro TM, Gossett JM, Tobias JD, Roth SJ.

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov;13(6):660-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318253c7f1.

PMID:
22791093
18.

A Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation.

Bergese SD, Candiotti KA, Bokesch PM, Zura A, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY; AWAKE Study Group.

Am J Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):586-95. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181d69072.

PMID:
20535016
19.

Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP.

Muller S, Borowics SM, Fortis EA, Stefani LC, Soares G, Maguilnik I, Breyer HP, Hidalgo MP, Caumo W.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):651-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.041. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

PMID:
18291396
20.

Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

Chamorro C, de Latorre FJ, Montero A, Sánchez-Izquierdo JA, Jareño A, Moreno JA, Gonzalez E, Barrios M, Carpintero JL, Martín-Santos F, Otero B, Ginestal R.

Crit Care Med. 1996 Jun;24(6):932-9.

PMID:
8681594
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk