Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.

Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):349-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x.

PMID:
21561476
2.

The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man.

Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Lang NP.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02107.x.

PMID:
21561477
3.

Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface.

Donos N, Hamlet S, Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Bosshardt DD, Ivanovski S.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):365-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02113.x.

PMID:
21561478
4.

The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.

Park JW, Kwon TG, Suh JY.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):706-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02444.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

PMID:
22409778
5.

Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.

Al-Nawas B, Groetz KA, Goetz H, Duschner H, Wagner W.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):1-8. Epub 2007 Oct 16.

PMID:
17944964
6.

The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.

Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):144-53.

PMID:
11952734
7.

Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J.

J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):448-55.

PMID:
15842258
8.

Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs.

Al-Hamdan K, Al-Moaber SH, Junker R, Jansen JA.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02106.x.

PMID:
21561482
9.

Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.

Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):755-60.

PMID:
17974109
10.

Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.

Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):233-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01473.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

PMID:
18177427
11.

Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.

Le Guehennec L, Goyenvalle E, Lopez-Heredia MA, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01547.x.

PMID:
18983312
12.

Re-osseointegration after treatment of peri-implantitis at different implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog.

Persson LG, Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Sennerby L.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Dec;12(6):595-603.

PMID:
11737103
13.

Time sequence of bone healing around two implant systems in minipigs: preliminary histologic results.

Carmagnola D, Abati S, Addis A, Ferrieri G, Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Vogel G.

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009 Oct;29(5):549-55.

PMID:
19888499
14.

Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.

Shibli JA, Feres M, de Figueiredo LC, Iezzi G, Piattelli A.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Mar 1;8(3):29-36.

PMID:
17351679
15.

Improving osseointegration of dental implants.

Elias CN, Meirelles L.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 Mar;7(2):241-56. doi: 10.1586/erd.09.74. Review.

PMID:
20214429
16.

Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.

Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jun;21(6):605-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x.

PMID:
20666787
17.
18.

Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study.

Ganeles J, Zöllner A, Jackowski J, ten Bruggenkate C, Beagle J, Guerra F.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1119-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01626.x.

PMID:
18983314
19.

Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.

Sul YT, Jönsson J, Yoon GS, Johansson C.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1146-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01767.x. Epub 2009 Aug 30.

PMID:
19719742
20.

A prospective multicenter study evaluating loading of osseotite implants two months after placement: one-year results.

Lazzara RJ, Porter SS, Testori T, Galante J, Zetterqvist L.

J Esthet Dent. 1998;10(6):280-9.

PMID:
10321197
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk