Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Computer-assisted photomicrographic evaluation of root canal morphology after removal of the filling material during retreatment.

Nica L, Grigorie M, Rusu D, Anghel MM, Didilescu A, Stratul SI.

Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(1 Suppl):443-8.

2.
3.

Current concepts in gutta-percha removal in endodontic retreatment.

Mounce R.

N Y State Dent J. 2004 Aug-Sep;70(7):32-5.

PMID:
15508680
5.
6.

In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent.

Takahashi CM, Cunha RS, de Martin AS, Fontana CE, Silveira CF, da Silveira Bueno CE.

J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1580-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.015.

PMID:
19840652
7.

Analysis of the gutta-percha filled area in C-shaped mandibular molars obturated with a modified MicroSeal technique.

Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Gutmann JL.

Int Endod J. 2009 Mar;42(3):186-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01495.x.

PMID:
19228207
8.

Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals.

Taşdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Celik D.

Int Endod J. 2008 Mar;41(3):191-6. Epub 2007 Dec 10.

PMID:
18081812
9.

A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment.

Imura N, Kato AS, Hata GI, Uemura M, Toda T, Weine F.

Int Endod J. 2000 Jul;33(4):361-6.

PMID:
11307212
10.

Efficacy of automated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment: an ex vivo study.

de Carvalho Maciel AC, Zaccaro Scelza MF.

Int Endod J. 2006 Oct;39(10):779-84.

PMID:
16948663
11.

Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.

Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Banegas G.

Int Endod J. 2006 Jul;39(7):521-6.

PMID:
16776756
12.

Management of the immature apex--a clinical guide.

Allen R, Mackie IC.

Dent Update. 2003 Oct;30(8):437-41.

PMID:
14619733
13.

Retreatment efficacy of gutta-percha removal using a clinical microscope and ultrasonic instruments: part I--an ex vivo study.

de Mello Junior JE, Cunha RS, Bueno CE, Zuolo ML.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jul;108(1):e59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.027.

PMID:
19540445
14.

Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of MTwo R and ProTaper universal retreatment systems in the removal of filling material.

Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpção TS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante AS, de Moraes IG.

J Endod. 2010 Nov;36(11):1870-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.013.

PMID:
20951303
15.

Endodontic retreatment: evaluation of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation.

Wilcox LR, Krell KV, Madison S, Rittman B.

J Endod. 1987 Sep;13(9):453-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
3482104
16.

Comparison of GPX with or without solvent and hand files in removing filling materials from root canals--an ex vivo study.

Betti LV, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Nov;110(5):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.012.

PMID:
20955955
17.

The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.

Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer CH.

J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):466-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.008.

PMID:
18358899
18.
19.
20.

Residue of gutta-percha and a glass ionomer cement sealer following root canal retreatment.

Friedman S, Moshonov J, Trope M.

Int Endod J. 1993 May;26(3):169-72.

PMID:
8406964
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk