Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence.

Peterson K, McDonagh MS, Fu R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):977-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

PMID:
21411283
2.

Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.

Tsertsvadze A, Maglione M, Chou R, Garritty C, Coleman C, Lux L, Bass E, Balshem H, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

PMID:
21684114
3.

AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540721
4.

Systematic review of comparative effectiveness data for oncology orphan drugs.

Cheng MM, Ramsey SD, Devine EB, Garrison LP, Bresnahan BW, Veenstra DL.

Am J Manag Care. 2012 Jan;18(1):47-62. Review.

5.

Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M, Glanville J, Gray A, Harris A, Johnston K, Lodge M.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. Review.

7.

Evidence-based medicine in health care reform.

Hughes GB.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Oct;145(4):526-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599811419458. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

PMID:
21860057
8.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
9.

Time to update and quantitative changes in the results of cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.

Jaidee W, Moher D, Laopaiboon M.

PLoS One. 2010 Jul 13;5(7):e11553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011553.

10.

International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Levy AR, Mitton C, Johnston KM, Harrigan B, Briggs AH.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
20831289
11.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
12.

Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Wilby J, Kainth A, Hawkins N, Epstein D, McIntosh H, McDaid C, Mason A, Golder S, O'Meara S, Sculpher M, Drummond M, Forbes C.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. Review.

13.

Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.

Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE, Ji J, Ansari MT, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.003. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18586179
14.

Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.

Kranke P.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;27(9):763-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a560a.

PMID:
20523217
15.

Intent to update systematic reviews: results of an internet survey.

Phung OJ, Baker WL, Baker EL, Coleman CI.

J Investig Med. 2011 Jun;59(5):811-5. doi: 10.231/JIM.0b013e3182124c75.

PMID:
21343828
16.

In which journals will pediatricians find the best evidence for clinical practice?

Birken CS, Parkin PC.

Pediatrics. 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):941-7.

PMID:
10224169
17.

Designing comparative effectiveness research on prescription drugs: lessons from the clinical trial literature.

Chokshi DA, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1842-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0843.

18.

Methods for the drug effectiveness review project.

McDonagh MS, Jonas DE, Gartlehner G, Little A, Peterson K, Carson S, Gibson M, Helfand M.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Sep 12;12:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-140.

19.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Garside R, Pitt M, Anderson R, Rogers G, Dyer M, Mealing S, Somerville M, Price A, Stein K.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk