Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 215

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21396633)

1.

The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration.

Pichler P, Dosani M, Oruç I, Barton JJ.

Cortex. 2012 Jun;48(6):725-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Feb 13.

PMID:
21396633
2.

Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.

Mazard A, Schiltz C, Rossion B.

Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):912-22. Epub 2005 Oct 17.

PMID:
16229867
3.

Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.

Richler JJ, Mack ML, Palmeri TJ, Gauthier I.

Vision Res. 2011 Feb 9;51(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.014. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

4.
5.

Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.

Moscovitch M, Moscovitch DA.

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb 1;17(1):201-19. doi: 10.1080/026432900380571.

PMID:
20945180
6.

The composite effect for inverted faces is reliable at large sample sizes and requires the basic face configuration.

Susilo T, Rezlescu C, Duchaine B.

J Vis. 2013 Nov 12;13(13):14. doi: 10.1167/13.13.14.

PMID:
24222184
7.

Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.

Marzi T, Viggiano MP.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Sep;65(3):182-92. Epub 2007 Apr 13.

PMID:
17512996
8.

Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.

Sadeh B, Yovel G.

Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 1;53(2):782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.029. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

PMID:
20558303
9.

Cross-orientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: a study using contrast-based recognition thresholds.

Guo XM, Oruç I, Barton JJ.

Vision Res. 2009 Sep;49(18):2254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

10.
11.

Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.

Gaspar C, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ.

Vision Res. 2008 Dec;48(28):2817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

12.

Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms.

Rhodes G, Jeffery L, Watson TL, Jaquet E, Winkler C, Clifford CW.

Curr Biol. 2004 Dec 14;14(23):2119-23.

PMID:
15589154
13.

Viewpoint invariance in the discrimination of upright and inverted faces.

Wright A, Barton JJ.

Vision Res. 2008 Nov;48(25):2545-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Oct 4.

14.

Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces.

Amishav R, Kimchi R.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):743-8. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.743.

PMID:
21037176
15.

Pulling faces: an investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect.

Watson TL, Clifford CW.

Perception. 2003;32(9):1109-16.

PMID:
14651323
17.

Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.

Barton JJ, Radcliffe N, Cherkasova MV, Edelman J, Intriligator JM.

Perception. 2006;35(8):1089-105.

PMID:
17076068
18.

Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Sekuler AB, Gaspar CM, Gold JM, Bennett PJ.

Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 9;14(5):391-6.

PMID:
15028214
19.

The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, mechanisms.

Brandman T, Yovel G.

J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 4;30(31):10534-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0911-10.2010.

20.

Specificity of face processing without awareness.

Zhou G, Zhang L, Liu J, Yang J, Qu Z.

Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

PMID:
20116293
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk