Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 126

1.

Asian immigrants to the United States are less likely to donate cryopreserved embryos for research use.

Sharma H, Johnstone EB, Gates E, Sohn SH, Huddleston HG, Fujimoto VY.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.123. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

PMID:
21329918
2.

Embryonic stem cells. Willingness to donate frozen embryos for stem cell research.

Lyerly AD, Faden RR.

Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):46-7. Epub 2007 Jun 21. No abstract available.

PMID:
17588897
3.

Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos.

Newton CR, Fisher J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Hughes L, Isacsson D.

Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3124-8. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

4.

Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: parents' choices.

Melamed RM, Bonetti TC, Braga DP, Madaschi C, Iaconelli A, Borges E.

Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Dec;12(4):185-90. doi: 10.3109/14647270903377186.

PMID:
19883291
5.

Embryo disposal practices in IVF clinics in the United States.

Gurmankin AD, Sisti D, Caplan AL.

Politics Life Sci. 2003 Sep;22(2):4-8. Epub 2004 Aug 9.

PMID:
16859369
6.

Disposition of cryopreserved embryos by infertility patients desiring to discontinue storage.

Lanzendorf S, Ratts V, Keller S, Odem R.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

PMID:
19338995
7.

Reflections by patients who undergo IVF on the use of their supernumerary embryos for science.

Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van de Velde A, Dhont M.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jun;20(7):880-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

PMID:
20413349
8.

Demographic, medical and treatment characteristics associated with couples' decisions to donate fresh spare embryos for research.

Choudhary M, Haimes E, Herbert M, Stojkovic M, Murdoch AP.

Hum Reprod. 2004 Sep;19(9):2091-6. Epub 2004 Jun 30.

9.

Couples' opinions regarding the fate of surplus frozen embryos.

Luna M, Boada M, Aran B, Coroleu B, Barri PN, Veiga A.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 2:11-5.

PMID:
19891843
10.

Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.

Lyerly AD, Steinhauser K, Voils C, Namey E, Alexander C, Bankowski B, Cook-Deegan R, Dodson WC, Gates E, Jungheim ES, McGovern PG, Myers ER, Osborn B, Schlaff W, Sugarman J, Tulsky JA, Walmer D, Faden RR, Wallach E.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Dec 5.

11.

Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia.

Burton PJ, Sanders K.

Med J Aust. 2004 Jun 7;180(11):559-61.

PMID:
15174985
12.

Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos.

Lyerly AD, Steinhauser K, Namey E, Tulsky JA, Cook-Deegan R, Sugarman J, Walmer D, Faden R, Wallach E.

Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1623-30. Epub 2006 May 4.

PMID:
16678178
13.

400,000 embryos and counting.

[No authors listed]

N Y Times Web. 2003 May 15:A34. No abstract available.

PMID:
12812168
14.

Clinics hold more embryos than had been thought.

Wade N.

N Y Times Web. 2003 May 9:A24. No abstract available.

PMID:
12812164
15.

Embryo disposition: choices made by patients and donor oocyte recipients.

Hill GA, Freeman MR.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):940-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 18.

PMID:
20850720
16.

Eligibility of cryopreserved human embryos for stem cell research in Canada.

Baylis F, Ram N.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Oct;27(10):949-55.

PMID:
16411010
17.

Factors associated with disposition of cryopreserved reproductive tissue.

Styer AK, Cekleniak NA, Legedza A, Mutter GL, Hornstein MD.

Fertil Steril. 2003 Sep;80(3):584-9.

PMID:
12969702
18.

Attitudes of couples towards the destination of surplus embryos: results among couples with cryopreserved embryos in Switzerland.

Mohler-Kuo M, Zellweger U, Duran A, Hohl MK, Gutzwiller F, Mutsch M.

Hum Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1930-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep103. Epub 2009 May 4.

19.

Factors associated with the donation and non-donation of embryos for research: a systematic review.

Samorinha C, Pereira M, Machado H, Figueiredo B, Silva S.

Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):641-55. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu026. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Review.

20.

Kass v. Kass.

New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Wests N Y Suppl. 1997 Sep 8;663:581-602.

PMID:
12041117
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk