Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 140

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21310011)

1.

Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract.

Mylonas G, Sacu S, Buehl W, Ritter M, Georgopoulos M, Schmidt-Erfurth U.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 May;89(3):e237-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02042.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

PMID:
21310011
2.

Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer.

Bjeloš Rončević M, Bušić M, Cima I, Kuzmanović Elabjer B, Bosnar D, Miletić D.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;249(1):83-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1546-z. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

PMID:
20981435
3.

Evaluation of 2 new optical biometry devices and comparison with the current gold standard biometer.

Chen YA, Hirnschall N, Findl O.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):513-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.041. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

PMID:
21244866
4.

Reproducibility of ocular biometry with a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer in children.

Şahin A, Gürsoy H, Başmak H, Yildirim N, Usalp Z, Çolak E.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):194-8.

PMID:
20853265
5.

Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

Montés-Micó R, Carones F, Buttacchio A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D.

J Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;27(9):665-71. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110202-01. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

PMID:
21323302
6.

[Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation].

El Chehab H, Giraud JM, Le Corre A, Chave N, Durand F, Kuter S, Ract-Madoux G, Swalduz B, Mourgues G, Dot C.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 Mar;34(3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.09.026. Epub 2011 Jan 22. French.

7.

Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.

Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2087-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

PMID:
19744720
8.

Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.

Kołodziejczyk W, Gałecki T, Łazicka-Gałecka M, Szaflik J.

Klin Oczna. 2011;113(1-3):47-51.

PMID:
21853951
9.

Ultrasound biometry vs. IOL Master.

Roy A, Das S, Sahu SK, Rath S.

Ophthalmology. 2012 Sep;119(9):1937.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.006. No abstract available.

PMID:
22944497
10.

Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.

Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007. Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):1066.

PMID:
20362858
11.

[Ocular biometry in children with hypermetropia: utility of the Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer (Haag-Streit(®))].

Loudot C, Zanin E, Fogliarini C, Boulze M, Souchon L, Denis D.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 Jun;34(6):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 May 7. French.

12.

Changes of axial length measured by IOL master during 2 years in eyes of adults with pathologic myopia.

Saka N, Moriyama M, Shimada N, Nagaoka N, Fukuda K, Hayashi K, Yoshida T, Tokoro T, Ohno-Matsui K.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;251(2):495-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2066-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

PMID:
22678715
13.

Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Nakakura S, Mori E, Nagatomi N, Tabuchi H, Kiuchi Y.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.036. Epub 2012 May 19.

PMID:
22613688
14.

Comparison of biometric measurements using partial coherence interferometry and applanation ultrasound.

Tehrani M, Krummenauer F, Kumar R, Dick HB.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Apr;29(4):747-52.

PMID:
12686243
15.

Postnatal elongation of eye size in DBA/2J mice compared with C57BL/6J mice: in vivo analysis with whole-eye OCT.

Chou TH, Kocaoglu OP, Borja D, Ruggeri M, Uhlhorn SR, Manns F, Porciatti V.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 1;52(6):3604-12. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6340.

16.

Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes.

Shen P, Zheng Y, Ding X, Liu B, Congdon N, Morgan I, He M.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.064. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

PMID:
23228592
17.

Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Jasvinder S, Khang TF, Sarinder KK, Loo VP, Subrayan V.

Eye (Lond). 2011 Jun;25(6):717-24. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.28. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

18.

Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.

Zhao J, Chen Z, Zhou Z, Ding L, Zhou X.

Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):92-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00793.x. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

PMID:
22943766
19.

Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements.

Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;93(6):807-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.152736. Epub 2009 Mar 15.

PMID:
19289385
20.

[Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].

Chiseliţă D, Cantemir A, Gălăţanu C, Irod A.

Oftalmologia. 2011;55(4):104-10. Romanian.

PMID:
22642145
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk