Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: an analogue study.

Mann E, Kellar I, Sutton S, Kinmonth AL, Hankins M, Griffin S, Marteau TM.

BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 17;10:768. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-768.

2.

Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.

Mann E, Prevost AT, Griffin S, Kellar I, Sutton S, Parker M, Sanderson S, Kinmonth AL, Marteau TM.

BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 20;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-63.

3.

Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening.

Kellar I, Sutton S, Griffin S, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, Marteau TM.

Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

PMID:
18513916
4.

Can informed choice invitations lead to inequities in intentions to make lifestyle changes among participants in a primary care diabetes screening programme? Evidence from a randomized trial.

Kellar I, Mann E, Kinmonth AL, Prevost AT, Sutton S, Marteau TM.

Public Health. 2011 Sep;125(9):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

PMID:
21764087
5.

Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.

Marteau TM, Mann E, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, Kellar I, Sanderson S, Parker M, Griffin S, Sutton S, Kinmonth AL.

BMJ. 2010 May 13;340:c2138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2138.

6.

Do women make an informed choice about participating in breast cancer screening? A survey among women invited for a first mammography screening examination.

van Agt H, Fracheboud J, van der Steen A, de Koning H.

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

PMID:
22963769
7.

[Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].

Spaczyński M, Karowicz-Bilinska A, Rokita W, Molińska-Glura M, Januszek-Michalecka L, Seroczyński P, Uchlik J, Nowak-Markwitz E.

Ginekol Pol. 2010 Sep;81(9):655-63. Polish.

PMID:
20973201
8.

Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.

Watson E, Hewitson P, Brett J, Bukach C, Evans R, Edwards A, Elwyn G, Cargill A, Austoker J.

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):367-79. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

PMID:
16875796
9.

Social patterning in knowledge following an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening.

Kellar I, Mason D.

Diabet Med. 2014 Apr;31(4):504-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12334. Epub 2013 Dec 13.

PMID:
24117707
10.

Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK.

Jepson RG, Hewison J, Thompson A, Weller D.

Soc Sci Med. 2007 Sep;65(5):890-9. Epub 2007 May 15.

PMID:
17507131
11.
12.

A randomized evaluation of loss and gain frames in an invitation to screening for type 2 diabetes: effects on attendance, anxiety and self-rated health.

Park P, Simmons RK, Prevost AT, Griffin SJ; ADDITION Cambridge study group.

J Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;15(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1359105309344896.

PMID:
20207663
13.

The role of attitudes towards the targets of behaviour in predicting and informing prenatal testing choices.

Bryant LD, Green JM, Hewison J.

Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1175-94. doi: 10.1080/08870440903055893.

PMID:
20204949
14.

Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.

Steckelberg A, Hülfenhaus C, Haastert B, Mühlhauser I.

BMJ. 2011 Jun 2;342:d3193. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3193.

15.
16.

Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.

Schofield PE, Cockburn J, Hill DJ, Reading D.

J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):144-9.

PMID:
8790507
17.

Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?

Nekhlyudov L, Li R, Fletcher SW.

Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):366-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00514.x.

PMID:
19076664
18.

Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.

Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):65-73.

19.

A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.

Smith SK, Trevena L, Simpson JM, Barratt A, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ.

BMJ. 2010 Oct 26;341:c5370. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5370.

20.

A mere measurement effect for anticipated regret: impacts on cervical screening attendance.

Sandberg T, Conner M.

Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;48(Pt 2):221-36. doi: 10.1348/014466608X347001. Epub 2008 Sep 12.

PMID:
18793492
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk