Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 197

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 20949457)

1.

Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration biopsy in breast--a historical perspective and opportunities in the modern era.

Nassar A.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 May;39(5):380-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.21433. Epub 2010 Oct 14. Review.

PMID:
20949457
2.

Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.

Vimpeli SM, Saarenmaa I, Huhtala H, Soimakallio S.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Oct;49(8):863-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850802235751.

PMID:
18618302
3.

Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S, Okada K, Fujiwara Y, Yamamura T.

J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Mar;190(3):299-303.

PMID:
10703854
4.

A comparision of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesions.

Barra Ade A, Gobbi H, de L Rezende CA, GouvĂȘa AP, de Lucena CE, Reis JH, Costa e Silva SZ.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2008 Jan;36(1):26-31.

PMID:
18064684
5.

Axillary staging by percutaneous biopsy: sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy.

Rao R, Lilley L, Andrews V, Radford L, Ulissey M.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1170-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0421-9. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

PMID:
19263171
6.
7.

Image-directed fine needle aspiration biopsy in nonpalpable breast lesions.

Gordon PB.

Clin Lab Med. 2005 Dec;25(4):655-78, v. Review.

PMID:
16308085
9.
10.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Evans WP.

Curr Opin Radiol. 1992 Oct;4(5):130-8. Review.

PMID:
1524972
11.

An analysis of fine needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy in clinically palpable breast lesions: a report on the predictive values and a cost comparison.

Nagar S, Iacco A, Riggs T, Kestenberg W, Keidan R.

Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.018. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

PMID:
22464444
12.

Usefulness of ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy for palpable breast tumors.

Hatada T, Aoki I, Okada K, Nakai T, Utsunomiya J.

Arch Surg. 1996 Oct;131(10):1095-8.

PMID:
8857910
13.

Accuracy of needle biopsy of breast lesions visible on ultrasound: audit of fine needle versus core needle biopsy in 3233 consecutive samplings with ascertained outcomes.

Brancato B, Crocetti E, Bianchi S, Catarzi S, Risso GG, Bulgaresi P, Piscioli F, Scialpi M, Ciatto S, Houssami N.

Breast. 2012 Aug;21(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

PMID:
22088803
14.

Unsuccessful preoperative biopsies, fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy, lead to increased costs in the diagnostic workup in breast cancer.

Hukkinen K, Kivisaari L, HeikkilÀ PS, Von Smitten K, Leidenius M.

Acta Oncol. 2008;47(6):1037-45. doi: 10.1080/02841860802001442.

PMID:
18607862
15.

Preoperative cytological and histological diagnosis of breast lesions: A critical review.

Kooistra B, Wauters C, Strobbe L, Wobbes T.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;36(10):934-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Aug 14. Review.

PMID:
20709485
16.

Needle core biopsy should replace fine needle aspiration cytology in ultrasound-guided sampling of breast lesions.

Brancato B, Scialpi M, Pusiol T, Zorzi MG, Morichetti D, Piscioli F.

Pathologica. 2011 Apr;103(2):52. No abstract available.

PMID:
21797145
17.

[Diagnostic accuracy of the fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy as a diagnostic method for breast lesions].

Frankel PP, Esteves VF, Thuler LC, Vieira RJ.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;33(3):139-43. Portuguese.

18.

Diagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better?

Tse GM, Tan PH.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Aug;123(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0962-4. Epub 2010 Jun 5. Review.

PMID:
20526738
19.
20.

Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art.

O'Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ.

Clin Radiol. 2010 Apr;65(4):259-70. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.008. Review.

PMID:
20338392
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk