Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 134

1.

Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens.

Chen CY, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Tsuruta S, Meuwissen TH, Aggrey SE, Wing T, Muir WM.

J Anim Sci. 2011 Jan;89(1):23-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3071. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

PMID:
20889689
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.

Moser G, Tier B, Crump RE, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW.

Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:56. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-56.

PMID:
20043835
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale.

Chen CY, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Muir WM.

J Anim Sci. 2011 Sep;89(9):2673-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3555. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

PMID:
21454868
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.

Lourenco DA, Misztal I, Wang H, Aguilar I, Tsuruta S, Bertrand JK.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Sep;91(9):4090-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5826. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

PMID:
23893997
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction.

Legarra A, Ducrocq V.

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4629-45. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4982.

PMID:
22818478
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Using recent versus complete pedigree data in genetic evaluation of a closed nucleus broiler line.

Mehrabani-Yeganeh H, Gibson JP, Schaeffer LR.

Poult Sci. 1999 Jul;78(7):937-41.

PMID:
10404672
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.

Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JC.

Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jun 21;43:23. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-23.

PMID:
21693035
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.

Misztal I, Aggrey SE, Muir WM.

Poult Sci. 2013 Sep;92(9):2530-4. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02739.

PMID:
23960138
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.

Calus MP, Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA.

J Anim Sci. 2011 Jul;89(7):2042-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3297. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

PMID:
21357451
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.

Verrier E.

Genet Sel Evol. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):17-38.

PMID:
11268312
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation.

Daetwyler HD, Swan AA, van der Werf JH, Hayes BJ.

Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Nov 12;44:33. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-33.

PMID:
23146144
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.
13.

Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes.

Wang H, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Muir WM.

Genet Res (Camb). 2012 Apr;94(2):73-83. doi: 10.1017/S0016672312000274.

PMID:
22624567
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.

Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Feb;93(2):743-52. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2730.

PMID:
20105546
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Resende MF Jr, Muñoz P, Resende MD, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL, Davis JM, Jokela EJ, Martin TA, Peter GF, Kirst M.

Genetics. 2012 Apr;190(4):1503-10. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.137026. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

PMID:
22271763
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
16.

Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.

Toosi A, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC.

J Anim Sci. 2010 Jan;88(1):32-46. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1975. Epub 2009 Sep 11.

PMID:
19749023
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
17.

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.

Lourenco DA, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Ezra E, Ron M, Shirak A, Weller JI.

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1742-52. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6916. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

PMID:
24472123
[PubMed - in process]
Free Article
18.

Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?

Lourenco DA, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Lawlor TJ, Forni S, Weller JI.

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Jun;97(6):3930-42. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7769. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

PMID:
24679931
[PubMed - in process]
19.

Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.

Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Berg P.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 May;92(5):2214-23. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1616.

PMID:
19389980
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk