Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Cumulative summation graphs are a useful tool for monitoring positive surgical margin rates in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Williams AK, Chalasani V, Martínez CH, Osbourne E, Stitt L, Izawa JI, Pautler SE.

BJU Int. 2011 May;107(10):1648-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09634.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

2.

Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel VR.

Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

PMID:
20163911
3.

A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.

J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17936849
4.

Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.

Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, Gettman MT.

BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

5.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s).

Williams SB, Chen MH, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, Kacker R, Hirsch MS, Richie JP, Hu JC.

Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1097-101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.079. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

PMID:
20303147
6.

Comparison of lymph node yield in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with that in open radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Lallas CD, Pe ML, Thumar AB, Chandrasekar T, Lee FC, McCue P, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ.

BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107(7):1136-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09621.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

7.

Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer.

Wambi CO, Siddiqui SA, Krane LS, Agarwal PK, Stricker HJ, Peabody JO.

BJU Int. 2010 Dec;106(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09484.x.

8.

Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: critical analysis of outcomes and learning curve.

McNeill AS, Nabi G, McLornan L, Cook J, Bollina P, Stolzenberg JU.

BJU Int. 2010 Nov;106(10):1537-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09322.x.

9.

Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Baumgartner RG, Smith JA Jr.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):929-31.

PMID:
17296378
10.

Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.

Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, Rahman MB, Rasiah KK, Pe Benito R, Delprado W, Matthews J, Haynes AM, Stricker PD.

BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):378-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09158.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

11.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.

Laurila TA, Huang W, Jarrard DF.

Urol Oncol. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

PMID:
18640061
12.

Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, D'Elia C, Boscolo-Berto R, Gardiman M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W.

J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2682-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.037.

PMID:
19836778
13.

The current state of robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Khatlani K, Sharma S, Mendoza PJ, Lee DI.

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2010 Jun;62(2):193-201. Review.

PMID:
20562799
14.

Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Marchetti PE, Shikanov S, Razmaria AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL.

Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.512. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

PMID:
21071070
15.

Does previous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy experience affect outcomes at robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, Carpentier P, Castle E, Dasgupta P, Davis R, Thomas R, Khan S, Kibel A, Kim H, Manoharan M, Menon M, Mottrie A, Ornstein D, Peabody J, Pruthi R, Palou Redorta J, Vira M, Schanne F, Stricker H, Wiklund P, Wilding G, Guru KA.

Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

PMID:
20709372
16.

Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misraï V, Haertig A, Bitker MO, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Rouprêt M.

World J Urol. 2009 Oct;27(5):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0379-z. Epub 2009 May 7.

PMID:
19421755
17.

Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Orvieto MA, Patel VR.

Scand J Surg. 2009;98(2):76-88. Review.

PMID:
19799045
18.

Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes.

Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, Vallancien G.

J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):945-9.

PMID:
12187196
19.
20.

The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG.

J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18635217
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk