Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 153

1.

Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.

Chakraborty M, Mangiamele LA, Burmeister SS.

PLoS One. 2010 Sep 22;5(9):e12898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012898.

2.

Auditory selectivity for acoustic features that confer species recognition in the tungara frog.

Mangiamele LA, Burmeister SS.

J Exp Biol. 2011 Sep 1;214(Pt 17):2911-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.058362.

3.

Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.

Kime NM, Whitney TK, Ryan MJ, Rand AS, Marler CA.

Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010 Jan 15;165(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.06.023. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

PMID:
19576218
4.

Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?

Jones PL, Farris HE, Ryan MJ, Page RA.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2013 Apr;199(4):279-83. doi: 10.1007/s00359-012-0791-5. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

PMID:
23322446
5.

Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.

Ryan MJ, Rand W, Hurd PL, Phelps SM, Rand AS.

Am Nat. 2003 Mar;161(3):380-94.

PMID:
12699219
6.

Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.

Ryan MJ, Bernal XE, Rand AS.

J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2235-47.

7.

Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses?

Ryan MJ, Rand AS.

Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1509-1516.

PMID:
9933549
8.

Female preferences for temporal order of call components in the túngara frog: a Bayesian analysis.

Wilczynski W, Rand SA, Ryan MJ.

Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):841-851.

PMID:
10512658
9.

Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.

Akre KL, Ryan MJ.

Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 23;20(6):502-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

10.

Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.

Hoke KL, Burmeister SS, Fernald RD, Rand AS, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W.

J Neurosci. 2004 Dec 15;24(50):11264-72.

11.

Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.

Kime NM, Whitney TK, Davis ES, Marler CA.

Brain Behav Evol. 2007;69(4):254-65. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

PMID:
17299257
12.

Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.

Bernal XE, Rand AS, Ryan MJ.

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 7;276(1660):1323-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0935. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

13.

Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions.

Hoke KL, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W.

Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):518-21. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0192.

14.

Effects of estradiol on neural responses to social signals in female túngara frogs.

Chakraborty M, Burmeister SS.

J Exp Biol. 2015 Nov;218(Pt 22):3671-7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.127738. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

16.

Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group.

Wilczynski W, Rand AS, Ryan MJ.

Brain Behav Evol. 2001;58(3):137-51.

PMID:
11910171
17.

The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.

Farris HE, Rand AS, Ryan MJ.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Dec;191(12):1173-83. Epub 2005 Aug 9.

PMID:
16088388
18.

Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs.

Hoke KL, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W.

Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 7;274(1610):641-9.

19.

Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.

Baugh AT, Akre KL, Ryan MJ.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 1;105(26):8985-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802201105. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

20.

The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus).

Baugh AT, Ryan MJ.

J Comp Psychol. 2010 Feb;124(1):66-80. doi: 10.1037/a0017227.

PMID:
20175598
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk