Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Survey of current practice related to grading of rejection in cardiac transplant recipients in North America.

Maleszewski JJ, Kucirka LM, Segev DL, Halushka MK.

Cardiovasc Pathol. 2011 Sep-Oct;20(5):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Sep 6.

PMID:
20822924
2.

Has the 2004 revision of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grading system improved the reproducibility of the diagnosis and grading of cardiac transplant rejection?

Yang HM, Lai CK, Gjertson DW, Baruch-Oren T, Ra SH, Watts W, Wallace WD, Shintaku P, Kobashigawa JA, Fishbein MC.

Cardiovasc Pathol. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

PMID:
18619859
3.

Nodular endocardial infiltrates (Quilty lesions) cause significant variability in diagnosis of ISHLT Grade 2 and 3A rejection in cardiac allograft recipients.

Marboe CC, Billingham M, Eisen H, Deng MC, Baron H, Mehra M, Hunt S, Wohlgemuth J, Mahmood I, Prentice J, Berry G.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Jul;24(7 Suppl):S219-26.

PMID:
15993777
4.

A web-based pilot study of inter-pathologist reproducibility using the ISHLT 2004 working formulation for biopsy diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection: the European experience.

Angelini A, Andersen CB, Bartoloni G, Black F, Bishop P, Doran H, Fedrigo M, Fries JW, Goddard M, Goebel H, Neil D, Leone O, Marzullo A, Ortmann M, Paraf F, Rotman S, Turhan N, Bruneval P, Frigo AC, Grigoletto F, Gasparetto A, Mencarelli R, Thiene G, Burke M.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Nov;30(11):1214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

PMID:
21816625
5.

Evaluation of biopsy classification for rejection: relation to detection of myocardial damage by monoclonal antimyosin antibody imaging.

Ballester M, Bordes R, Tazelaar HD, Carrió I, Marrugat J, Narula J, Billingham ME.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 May;31(6):1357-61.

6.

Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, Tazelaar HD, Kobashigawa J, Abrams J, Andersen CB, Angelini A, Berry GJ, Burke MM, Demetris AJ, Hammond E, Itescu S, Marboe CC, McManus B, Reed EF, Reinsmoen NL, Rodriguez ER, Rose AG, Rose M, Suciu-Focia N, Zeevi A, Billingham ME.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1710-20. Epub 2005 Jun 20.

PMID:
16297770
7.

Revision of the 1996 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of lung rejection.

Stewart S, Fishbein MC, Snell GI, Berry GJ, Boehler A, Burke MM, Glanville A, Gould FK, Magro C, Marboe CC, McNeil KD, Reed EF, Reinsmoen NL, Scott JP, Studer SM, Tazelaar HD, Wallwork JL, Westall G, Zamora MR, Zeevi A, Yousem SA.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Dec;26(12):1229-42.

PMID:
18096473
8.

The challenge of endomyocardial biopsy interpretation in assessing cardiac allograft rejection.

Winters GL.

Curr Opin Cardiol. 1997 Mar;12(2):146-52. Review.

PMID:
9192483
9.

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil based formulation of cyclosporine--results at six months after transplantation.

Eisen HJ, Hobbs RE, Davis SF, Laufer G, Mancini DM, Renlund DG, Valantine H, Ventura H, Vachiery JL, Bourge RC, Canver CC, Carrier M, Costanzo MR, Copeland J, Dureau G, Frazier OH, Dorent R, Hauptman PJ, Kells C, Master R, Michaud JL, Paradis I, Smith A, Vanhaecke J, Mueller EA, et al.

Transplantation. 1999 Sep 15;68(5):663-71.

PMID:
10507486
11.

Gene expression profiling distinguishes a molecular signature for grade 1B mild acute cellular rejection in cardiac allograft recipients.

Bernstein D, Williams GE, Eisen H, Mital S, Wohlgemuth JG, Klingler TM, Fang KC, Deng MC, Kobashigawa J.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Dec;26(12):1270-80.

PMID:
18096478
13.

Allograft rejection of ISHLT grade >/=3A occurring late after heart transplantation--a distinct entity?

Klingenberg R, Koch A, Schnabel PA, Zimmermann R, Sack FU, Haass M, Dengler TJ.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003 Sep;22(9):1005-13.

PMID:
12957610
14.

Elevated serum concentrations of cardiac troponin T in acute allograft rejection after human heart transplantation.

Dengler TJ, Zimmermann R, Braun K, Müller-Bardorff M, Zehelein J, Sack FU, Schnabel PA, Kübler W, Katus HA.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):405-12.

15.
16.

Effect of adopting a new histological grading system of acute rejection after heart transplantation.

Balk AH, Zondervan PE, van der Meer P, van Gelder T, Mochtar B, Simoons ML, Weimar W.

Heart. 1997 Dec;78(6):603-7.

17.

Reproducibility of the acute rejection diagnosis in human cardiac allografts. The Stanford Classification and the International Grading System.

Nielsen H, Sørensen FB, Nielsen B, Bagger JP, Thayssen P, Baandrup U.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Mar-Apr;12(2):239-43.

PMID:
8476896
18.

What else distinguishes cellular rejection grade 1A from 0? Annexin V and BCL in elective biopsies received from heart transplant recipients.

Zeglen S, Nozynski J, Wozniak-Grygiel E, Zakliczynski M, Kucewicz-Czech E, Laszewska A, Cichoracka A, Zembala M.

Transplant Proc. 2009 Oct;41(8):3198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.062.

PMID:
19857709
19.

Endothelin plasma levels in acute graft rejection after heart transplantation.

Dengler TJ, Zimmermann R, Tiefenbacher CP, Braun K, Sack FU, Kübler W.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995 Nov-Dec;14(6 Pt 1):1057-64.

PMID:
8719451
20.

Potential refinements of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation primary graft dysfunction grading system.

Oto T, Levvey BJ, Snell GI.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 May;26(5):431-6. Epub 2007 Mar 21. Review.

PMID:
17449410
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk