Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 187

1.

Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, Landy HJ, Hibbard JU, Haberman S, Ramirez MM, Bailit JL, Hoffman MK, Gregory KD, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Kominiarek M, Learman LA, Hatjis CG, van Veldhuisen P; Consortium on Safe Labor.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):326.e1-326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

PMID:
20708166
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia -- effect on subsequent trial of labor.

Abildgaard H, Ingerslev MD, Nickelsen C, Secher NJ.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Feb;92(2):193-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12023. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

PMID:
23025257
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.

Macara LM, Murphy KW.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;171(1):71-7.

PMID:
7794300
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.

Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK.

Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):698-704.

PMID:
15802393
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.

Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1016-23.

PMID:
16157104
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem.

Boyle A, Reddy UM.

Semin Perinatol. 2012 Oct;36(5):308-14. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.012. Review.

PMID:
23009961
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.
8.

The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.

Foley ME, Alarab M, Daly L, Keane D, Rath A, O'herlihy C.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):891-5.

PMID:
15467560
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.

Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB.

Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. Review.

PMID:
17011400
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.

Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):883-7.

PMID:
11641671
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section.

Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Carroll CS, Barrilleaux PS, Scardo JA, Martin JN Jr.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;185(2):349-54.

PMID:
11518890
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

[Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].

Lehmann M, Hedelin G, Sorgue C, Göllner JL, Grall C, Chami A, Collin D.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999 Jul;28(4):358-68. French.

PMID:
10480067
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

Trial of labor: a disciplined approach to labor management resulting in a high rate of vaginal delivery.

Videla FL, Satin AJ, Barth WH Jr, Hankins GD.

Am J Perinatol. 1995 May;12(3):181-4.

PMID:
7612091
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.

Melamed N, Segev M, Hadar E, Peled Y, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):49.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

PMID:
23507547
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?

Lydon-Rochelle MT, Gardella C, Cárdenas V, Easterling TR.

Birth. 2006 Mar;33(1):4-11.

PMID:
16499526
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Vaginal birth after cesarean.

McMahon MJ.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;41(2):369-81. Review.

PMID:
9646969
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.

Sperling LS, Henriksen TB, Ulrichsen H, Hedegård M, Møller H, Hansen V, Ovlisen B, Secher NJ.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Feb;73(2):129-35.

PMID:
8116351
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Should we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor?

Bujold E, Gauthier RJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;98(4):652-5.

PMID:
11576583
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies: a population-based study.

Erez O, Dukler D, Novack L, Rozen A, Zolotnik L, Bashiri A, Koifman A, Mazor M.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):537.e1-11.

PMID:
17547885
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.

Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3.

PMID:
11408854
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk