Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

The importance of accounting for the area of the medullary cavity in cross-sectional geometry: A test based on the femoral midshaft.

Sparacello VS, Pearson OM.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Dec;143(4):612-24. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21361.

PMID:
20623682
2.

Periosteal versus true cross-sectional geometry: a comparison along humeral, femoral, and tibial diaphyses.

Macintosh AA, Davies TG, Ryan TM, Shaw CN, Stock JT.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Mar;150(3):442-52. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22218. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

PMID:
23359138
3.
4.

Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.

Högler W, Blimkie CJ, Cowell CT, Inglis D, Rauch F, Kemp AF, Wiebe P, Duncan CS, Farpour-Lambert N, Woodhead HJ.

Bone. 2008 May;42(5):982-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Jan 26.

PMID:
18337201
6.

Dimensions and volumetric BMD of the proximal femur and their relation to age among older U.S. men.

Marshall LM, Lang TF, Lambert LC, Zmuda JM, Ensrud KE, Orwoll ES; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group.

J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Aug;21(8):1197-206.

7.

Body size, locomotion, and long bone cross-sectional geometry in indriid primates.

Demes B, Jungers WL, Selpien K.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991 Dec;86(4):537-47.

PMID:
1776660
8.

Mobility in Central European Late Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age: femoral cross-sectional geometry.

Sládek V, Berner M, Sailer R.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Jul;130(3):320-32.

PMID:
16402366
9.

Technical note: The effect of midshaft location on the error ranges of femoral and tibial cross-sectional parameters.

Sládek V, Berner M, Galeta P, Friedl L, Kudrnová S.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Feb;141(2):325-32. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21153.

PMID:
19919000
10.
11.

Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: Ontogeny.

Ruff CB, Walker A, Trinkaus E.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 Jan;93(1):35-54.

PMID:
8141241
13.

Bone mineral and geometric changes through the femur with immobilization due to spinal cord injury.

Kiratli BJ, Smith AE, Nauenberg T, Kallfelz CF, Perkash I.

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;37(2):225-33.

PMID:
10850829
14.

Examining bone surfaces across puberty: a 20-month pQCT trial.

Kontulainen SA, Macdonald HM, Khan KM, McKay HA.

J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Jul;20(7):1202-7. Epub 2005 Feb 28.

15.

Estimation of trabecular thickness using ultrasonic backcatter.

Padilla F, Jenson F, Laugier P.

Ultrason Imaging. 2006 Jan;28(1):3-22.

PMID:
16924879
16.

Bilateral symmetry of the human metacarpal: implications for sample size calculations.

Barker DS, Schultz C, Krishnan J, Hearn TC.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Oct;20(8):846-52.

PMID:
16026912
17.

Structural consequences of endosteal metastatic lesions in long bones.

Hipp JA, McBroom RJ, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC.

J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):828-37.

PMID:
2795323
18.
20.

Estimating body mass in subadult human skeletons.

Robbins G, Sciulli PW, Blatt SH.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Sep;143(1):146-50. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21320.

PMID:
20734440
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk