Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

Programme evaluation using student self-assessments.

Trinder KM, D'Eon MF.

Med Educ. 2010 May;44(5):507-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03697.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
20518996
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

With no shelf exam available, SAEM online clerkship testing tool best option.

Emery M.

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;17(9):1028; author reply 1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00855.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
20836790
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Evaluation of the use of patient-focused simulation for student assessment in a surgery clerkship.

Isenberg GA, Berg KW, Veloski JA, Berg DD, Veloski JJ, Yeo CJ.

Am J Surg. 2011 Jun;201(6):835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.034. Epub 2010 Sep 18.

PMID:
20851374
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

The dependability of students' ratings of preceptors.

Mazor K, Clauser B, Cohen A, Alper E, Pugnaire M.

Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10 Suppl):S19-21. No abstract available.

PMID:
10536582
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Evaluating the internal medicine clerkship: a CDIM commentary. Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine.

[No authors listed]

Am J Med. 1994 Nov;97(5):I-VII. No abstract available.

PMID:
7977427
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Psychiatry clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination is here to stay.

Vaidya NA.

Acad Psychiatry. 2008 May-Jun;32(3):177-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.32.3.177. No abstract available.

PMID:
18467471
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?

Weiss PM, Koller CA, Hess LW, Wasser T.

Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):445-9.

PMID:
16147799
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Student evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology: self- versus departmental assessment.

Herbert WN, McGaghie WC, Droegemueller W, Riddle MH, Maxwell KL.

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;76(3 Pt 1):458-61.

PMID:
2381623
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

A generalizability study of a new standardized rating form used to evaluate students' clinical clerkship performances.

Kreiter CD, Ferguson K, Lee WC, Brennan RL, Densen P.

Acad Med. 1998 Dec;73(12):1294-8.

PMID:
9883207
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Adapting the Key Features Examination for a clinical clerkship.

Hatala R, Norman GR.

Med Educ. 2002 Feb;36(2):160-5.

PMID:
11869444
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

The readiness for clerkship survey: can self-assessment data be used to evaluate program effectiveness?

Peterson LN, Eva KW, Rusticus SA, Lovato CY.

Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1355-60.

PMID:
22914522
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

World Wide Web program for optimizing and assessing medical student performance during the radiology clerkship.

Davison BD, Tello R, Blickman JG.

Acad Radiol. 2000 Apr;7(4):260-3.

PMID:
10766099
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance.

Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer JM, Loney E, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP.

Med Educ. 2011 Jun;45(6):636-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03888.x.

PMID:
21564201
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

"Making the grade:" noncognitive predictors of medical students' clinical clerkship grades.

Lee KB, Vaishnavi SN, Lau SK, Andriole DA, Jeffe DB.

J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Oct;99(10):1138-50.

PMID:
17987918
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

Use of standardized patients to identify deficits in student performance and curriculum effectiveness.

Haydon R 3rd, Donnelly M, Schwartz R, Strodel W, Jones R.

Am J Surg. 1994 Jul;168(1):57-64; discussion 64-5.

PMID:
8024100
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note.

Reznich CB, Wagner DP, Noel MM.

Med Educ. 2010 Mar;44(3):298-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03600.x.

PMID:
20444061
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Experiences with an honors paper as part of the psychiatry clerkship.

Brouette T.

Med Teach. 2012;34(4):339. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.661893. No abstract available.

PMID:
22455709
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Is clinical competence perceived differently for student daily performance on the wards versus clerkship grading?

Wimmers PF, Kanter SL, Splinter TA, Schmidt HG.

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):693-707. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

PMID:
17690992
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

A formative midterm test increases accuracy of identifying students at risk of failing a third year surgery clerkship.

Corcoran J, Halverson AL, Schindler N.

Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):260-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

PMID:
24268701
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Web-based evaluation of medical clerkships: a new approach to immediacy and efficacy of feedback and assessment.

Duque G.

Med Teach. 2003 Sep;25(5):510-4.

PMID:
14522674
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk