Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, Nendaz M, Perneger T, Bounameaux H, Perrier A, Righini M.

J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):957-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03801.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2. Review.

PMID:
20149072
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.

PMID:
19404542
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution.

Moores LK, Collen JF, Woods KM, Shorr AF.

Thromb Res. 2004;113(1):1-6.

PMID:
15081559
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J.

Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20.

PMID:
10744147
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.

Kabrhel C.

J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;35(4):373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.08.070. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

PMID:
18343077
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;6(1):40-4. Epub 2007 Oct 29.

PMID:
17973649
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Effect of patient location on the performance of clinical models to predict pulmonary embolism.

Ollenberger GP, Worsley DF.

Thromb Res. 2006;118(6):685-90. Epub 2005 Dec 27.

PMID:
16380153
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Miniati M, Pistolesi M.

Q J Nucl Med. 2001 Dec;45(4):287-93.

PMID:
11893965
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Comparison of the Wells and Revised Geneva Scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an Australian experience.

Wong DD, Ramaseshan G, Mendelson RM.

Intern Med J. 2011 Mar;41(3):258-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02204.x.

PMID:
20214691
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors.

Tillie-Leblond I, Marquette CH, Perez T, Scherpereel A, Zanetti C, Tonnel AB, Remy-Jardin M.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):390-6.

PMID:
16549851
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.

Douma RA, Gibson NS, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Wells PS, Perrier A, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan;101(1):197-200.

PMID:
19132208
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.
13.

Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis.

Pasha SM, Klok FA, Snoep JD, Mos IC, Goekoop RJ, Rodger MA, Huisman MV.

Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):e123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.009. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

PMID:
19942258
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2131-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2131.

PMID:
18955643
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the simplify D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients.

Kline JA, Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, Mitchell AM.

Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1417-23.

PMID:
16778257
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule does not safely exclude pulmonary embolism.

Hugli O, Righini M, Le Gal G, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D.

J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Feb;9(2):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04147.x. Erratum in: J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Apr;10(4):740.

PMID:
21091866
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Prognostic clinical prediction rules to identify a low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Squizzato A, Donadini MP, Galli L, Dentali F, Aujesky D, Ageno W.

J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jul;10(7):1276-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04739.x. Review. Erratum in: J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;11(1):218-20.

PMID:
22498033
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Quantitative high D-dimer value is predictive of pulmonary embolism occurrence independently of clinical score in a well-defined low risk factor population.

Bosson JL, Barro C, Satger B, Carpentier PH, Polack B, Pernod G.

J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Jan;3(1):93-9.

PMID:
15634271
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

[Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].

Ulukavak Ciftçi T, Köktürk N, Demir N, Oğuzülgen KI, Ekim N.

Tuberk Toraks. 2005;53(3):252-8. Turkish.

PMID:
16258884
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Righini M, Bounameaux H.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Sep;10(5):345-9. Review.

PMID:
15316430
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk