Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Intraoperative techniques to reduce the potential of set-screw loosening in long spinal constructs: a static and fatigue biomechanical investigation.

Serhan H, Hammerberg K, O'Neil M, Sturm P, Mardjetko S, Crawford A.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Oct;23(7):e31-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c982a1.

PMID:
20124911
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Biomechanical evaluation of anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis: in vitro fatigue simulation.

Shimamoto N, Kotani Y, Shono Y, Kadoya K, Abumi K, Kaneda K, Minami A.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 15;26(24):2701-8.

PMID:
11740358
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model.

Lebwohl NH, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev A, Shimamoto N, Gooch L, Devlin V, Boachie-Adjei O, Wagner TA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2312-20.

PMID:
12438978
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

The effect of screw length and bone cement augmentation on the fixation strength of iliac screws: a biomechanical study.

Zheng ZM, Zhang KB, Zhang JF, Yu BS, Liu H, Zhuang XM.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):545-50. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181929e0c.

PMID:
19956027
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Biomechanical analysis of derotation of the thoracic spine using pedicle screws.

Cheng I, Hay D, Iezza A, Lindsey D, Lenke LG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):1039-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d85ec8.

PMID:
20393385
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Loosening of sacral screw fixation under in vitro fatigue loading.

Lu WW, Zhu Q, Holmes AD, Luk KD, Zhong S, Leong JC.

J Orthop Res. 2000 Sep;18(5):808-14.

PMID:
11117304
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Biomechanical evaluation of lumbosacral reconstruction techniques for spondylolisthesis: an in vitro porcine model.

Cunningham BW, Lewis SJ, Long J, Dmitriev AE, Linville DA, Bridwell KH.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2321-7.

PMID:
12438979
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.

Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 1;33(23):E865-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318184ace8.

PMID:
18978579
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-iliac fixation constructs: an anatomical and biomechanical study.

Zheng ZM, Yu BS, Chen H, Aladin DM, Zhang KB, Zhang JF, Liu H, Luk KD, Lu WW.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):E565-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac8fc4.

PMID:
19770599
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Biomechanical evaluation of relationship of screw pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density in the cervical spine.

Reitman CA, Nguyen L, Fogel GR.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Aug;17(4):306-11.

PMID:
15280760
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique.

Mahar AT, Bagheri R, Oka R, Kostial P, Akbarnia BA.

Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):933-9. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

PMID:
18082463
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation.

Luk KD, Chen L, Lu WW.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 1;30(5):525-9.

PMID:
15738784
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support.

Zhang H, Johnston CE 2nd, Pierce WA, Ashman RB, Bronson DG, Haideri NF.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 1;31(25):E934-40.

PMID:
17139209
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Instrumented forceps for measuring tensile forces in the rod of the VDS implant during correction of scoliosis.

Klöckner C, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2003 Dec;48(12):362-4.

PMID:
14740525
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.

Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, Marcu D.

Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):667-72.

PMID:
17088197
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

A biomechanical study of top screw pullout in anterior scoliosis correction constructs.

Mayo AE, Labrom RD, Askin GN, Adam CJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):E587-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd389d.

PMID:
20461033
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Droge JA, Braun JT.

Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):78-85.

PMID:
16413452
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.

Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, Womack WJ, Puttlitz CM.

Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 14.

PMID:
18790684
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

[Residual stability of different interbody fusion techniques after pedicle screw loosening].

Diedrich O, Kraft CN, Lüring C, Perlick L, Pennekamp PH.

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Mar-Apr;143(2):179-85. German.

PMID:
15849637
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.

McGirt MJ, Sutter EG, Xu R, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A.

Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345642.50726.A3.

PMID:
19934991
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk