Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 116

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 20122229)

1.

Estimating true evolutionary distances under rearrangements, duplications, and losses.

Lin Y, Rajan V, Swenson KM, Moret BM.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 18;11 Suppl 1:S54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S54.

2.

Comparing genomes with rearrangements and segmental duplications.

Shao M, Moret BM.

Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun 15;31(12):i329-i338. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv229.

3.

On the family-free DCJ distance and similarity.

Martinez FV, Feijão P, Braga MD, Stoye J.

Algorithms Mol Biol. 2015 Apr 1;10:13. doi: 10.1186/s13015-015-0041-9. eCollection 2015.

4.

Advances in computer simulation of genome evolution: toward more realistic evolutionary genomics analysis by approximate bayesian computation.

Arenas M.

J Mol Evol. 2015 Apr;80(3-4):189-92. doi: 10.1007/s00239-015-9673-0. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

PMID:
25808249
5.

The 3D Organization of Chromatin Explains Evolutionary Fragile Genomic Regions.

Berthelot C, Muffato M, Abecassis J, Roest Crollius H.

Cell Rep. 2015 Mar 17. pii: S2211-1247(15)00204-1. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.046. [Epub ahead of print]

6.

Assessing the limits of restraint-based 3D modeling of genomes and genomic domains.

Trussart M, Serra F, Baù D, Junier I, Serrano L, Marti-Renom MA.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):3465-77. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv221. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

7.

Estimating evolutionary distances between genomic sequences from spaced-word matches.

Morgenstern B, Zhu B, Horwege S, Leimeister CA.

Algorithms Mol Biol. 2015 Feb 11;10:5. doi: 10.1186/s13015-015-0032-x. eCollection 2015.

8.

Evolution of tRNA Repertoires in Bacillus Inferred with OrthoAlign.

Tremblay-Savard O, Benzaid B, Lang BF, El-Mabrouk N.

Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jun;32(6):1643-56. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv029. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

PMID:
25660374
9.

Genome-wide gene order distances support clustering the gram-positive bacteria.

House CH, Pellegrini M, Fitz-Gibbon ST.

Front Microbiol. 2015 Jan 20;5:785. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00785. eCollection 2014.

10.

Robustness of birth-death and gain models for inferring evolutionary events.

Stolzer M, Wasserman L, Durand D.

BMC Genomics. 2014;15 Suppl 6:S9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S6-S9. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

11.

An Exact Algorithm to Compute the Double-Cut-and-Join Distance for Genomes with Duplicate Genes.

Shao M, Lin Y, Moret BM.

J Comput Biol. 2015 May;22(5):425-35. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0096. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

PMID:
25517208
12.

andi: fast and accurate estimation of evolutionary distances between closely related genomes.

Haubold B, Klötzl F, Pfaffelhuber P.

Bioinformatics. 2015 Apr 15;31(8):1169-75. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu815. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

PMID:
25504847
13.

Algebraic double cut and join : A group-theoretic approach to the operator on multichromosomal genomes.

Bhatia S, Egri-Nagy A, Francis AR.

J Math Biol. 2014 Dec 11. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25502846
14.

MLGO: phylogeny reconstruction and ancestral inference from gene-order data.

Hu F, Lin Y, Tang J.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 8;15:354. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0354-6.

15.

Analysis of micro-rearrangements in 25 eukaryotic species pairs by SyntenyMapper.

Kaufmann S, Frishman D.

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e112341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112341. eCollection 2014.

16.

Fast and accurate estimation of the covariance between pairwise maximum likelihood distances.

Gil M.

PeerJ. 2014 Sep 25;2:e583. doi: 10.7717/peerj.583. eCollection 2014.

17.

Reconstruction of phylogenetic trees of prokaryotes using maximal common intervals.

Heydari M, Marashi SA, Tusserkani R, Sadeghi M.

Biosystems. 2014 Oct;124:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

PMID:
25195150
18.

Insights into structural variations and genome rearrangements in prokaryotic genomes.

Periwal V, Scaria V.

Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 1;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu600. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Review.

PMID:
25189783
19.

A unifying model of genome evolution under parsimony.

Paten B, Zerbino DR, Hickey G, Haussler D.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jun 19;15:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-206.

20.

A statistical approach for inferring the 3D structure of the genome.

Varoquaux N, Ay F, Noble WS, Vert JP.

Bioinformatics. 2014 Jun 15;30(12):i26-33. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu268.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk