Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 20119837)

1.

Load sharing properties of cervical pedicle screw-rod constructs versus lateral mass screw-rod constructs.

Dunlap BJ, Karaikovic EE, Park HS, Sokolowski MJ, Zhang LQ.

Eur Spine J. 2010 May;19(5):803-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1278-0. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

2.

Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation.

Ito Z, Higashino K, Kato S, Kim SS, Wong E, Yoshioka K, Hutton WC.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Apr;27(2):80-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824e65f4.

PMID:
22373932
3.

A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.

Rhee JM, Kraiwattanapong C, Hutton WC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):E636-40.

PMID:
16261101
4.

Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.

Kothe R, Rüther W, Schneider E, Linke B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):1869-75.

PMID:
15534407
5.

Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.

Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.

Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):194-204. Epub 2006 Dec 22.

PMID:
17321969
6.

Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Meeting. Laboratory investigation.

Xu R, McGirt MJ, Sutter EG, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Dec;13(6):688-94. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09712.

PMID:
21121745
7.

Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.

Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, Marcu D.

Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):667-72.

PMID:
17088197
8.

Lateral mass versus hybrid construct for cervical laminectomy and fusion.

Regan CM, Emmanuel S, Hornik C, Weinhold P, Lim MR.

Orthopedics. 2013 Apr;36(4):e484-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130327-27.

PMID:
23590790
9.

Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.

McGirt MJ, Sutter EG, Xu R, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A.

Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345642.50726.A3.

PMID:
19934991
10.

Biomechanics of C-7 transfacet screw fixation.

Horn EM, Reyes PM, Baek S, Senoglu M, Theodore N, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Sep;11(3):338-43. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08785.

PMID:
19769516
11.

Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines.

Papagelopoulos PJ, Currier BL, Neale PG, Hokari Y, Berglund LJ, Larson DR, Fisher DR, An KN.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun;(411):13-24. Erratum in: Clin Orthop. 2003 Sep;(414):347.

PMID:
12782855
12.

Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison.

Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 May 1;22(9):977-82.

PMID:
9152447
13.

Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.

Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 1;33(23):E865-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318184ace8.

PMID:
18978579
14.

Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.

Liu GY, Xu RM, Ma WH, Sun SH, Huang L, Ying JW, Jiang WY.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Aug 5;121(15):1390-3.

PMID:
18959115
15.

Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.

Akesen B, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577242.

PMID:
18418135
16.

Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine.

Bozkus H, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Nottmeier EW, Sonntag VK, Papadopoulos SM, Crawford NR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):915-22.

PMID:
15834336
17.

C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.

Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Xiang M, Zhao WD, Zhong SZ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):371-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318193a21b.

PMID:
19214096
18.

A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.

Hostin RA, Wu C, Perra JH, Polly DW, Akesen B, Wroblewski JM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2415-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818916e3.

PMID:
18923316
19.

Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.

Bozkuş H, Senoğlu M, Baek S, Sawa AG, Ozer AF, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Feb;12(2):183-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE0951.

PMID:
20121354
20.

Biomechanical comparison of transarticular facet screws to lateral mass plates in two-level instrumentations of the cervical spine.

DalCanto RA, Lieberman I, Inceoglu S, Kayanja M, Ferrara L.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):897-2.

PMID:
15834333
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk