Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 153

1.

Biomechanical evaluation of peri- and interprosthetic fractures of the femur.

Lehmann W, Rupprecht M, Hellmers N, Sellenschloh K, Briem D, Püschel K, Amling M, Morlock M, Rueger JM.

J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1459-63. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bb8d89.

PMID:
20093986
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].

Krbec M, Motycka J, Lunácek L, Dousa P.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8. Czech.

PMID:
20067694
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

What is the risk of stress risers for interprosthetic fractures of the femur? A biomechanical analysis.

Lehmann W, Rupprecht M, Nuechtern J, Melzner D, Sellenschloh K, Kolb J, Fensky F, Hoffmann M, Püschel K, Morlock M, Rueger JM.

Int Orthop. 2012 Dec;36(12):2441-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1697-0. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

PMID:
23132503
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.

Harris T, Ruth JT, Szivek J, Haywood B.

J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):930-5.

PMID:
12777906
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Internal fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures: comparative biomechanical performance of the 95-degree blade plate and two retrograde nails.

Ito K, Grass R, Zwipp H.

J Orthop Trauma. 1998 May;12(4):259-66.

PMID:
9619461
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Management and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures.

Platzer P, Schuster R, Luxl M, Widhalm HK, Eipeldauer S, Krusche-Mandl I, Ostermann R, Blutsch B, Vécsei V.

Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.020. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

PMID:
21176899
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Wilson D, Frei H, Masri BA, Oxland TR, Duncan CP.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Jan;20(1):70-6.

PMID:
15567539
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.

Thomsen MN, Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Kretzer JP, Clarius M.

Orthopedics. 2008 Jul;31(7):653.

PMID:
19292385
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate.

David SM, Harrow ME, Peindl RD, Frick SL, Kellam JF.

J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jul;11(5):344-50.

PMID:
9294798
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.

Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, Schoenfeld AJ, Baji A, Njus GO.

J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):443-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815edeb8.

PMID:
19204519
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Interprosthetic fractures of the femur: treatment with a single-locked plate.

Sah AP, Marshall A, Virkus WV, Estok DM 2nd, Della Valle CJ.

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

PMID:
19056231
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.

Krischak GD, Augat P, Beck A, Arand M, Baier B, Blakytny R, Gebhard F, Claes L.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Dec;22(10):1112-8. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

PMID:
17900766
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Tencer AF, Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Gill K.

J Orthop Res. 1984;2(3):297-305.

PMID:
6491820
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

[The prosthesis nail -- a new stable fixation device for periprosthetic fractures and critical fractures of the proximal femur].

Probst A, Schneider T, Hankemeier S, Brug E.

Unfallchirurg. 2003 Sep;106(9):722-31. German.

PMID:
14631527
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Distal femoral fixation: a laboratory comparison of the 95 degrees plate, antegrade and retrograde inserted reamed intramedullary nails.

Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Bharam S, Chen D, Halder S.

J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(6):378-82.

PMID:
8854314
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Treatment of interprosthetic fractures of the femur.

Hou Z, Moore B, Bowen TR, Irgit K, Matzko ME, Strohecker KA, Smith WR.

J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1715-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821dd9f1.

PMID:
22182879
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Biomechanical analysis and quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy on thrust plate hip prosthesis.

Goto T, Yasunaga Y, Takahashi K, Ochi M.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jul;124(6):357-62. Epub 2004 Apr 24.

PMID:
15108008
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Interprosthetic femoral fractures: analysis of 14 cases. Proposal for an additional grade in the Vancouver and SoFCOT classifications.

Soenen M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F, Girard J, Mathevon H, Ehlinger M.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Nov;97(7):693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

PMID:
21982823
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Mechanics of retrograde nail versus plate fixation for supracondylar femur fractures.

Firoozbakhsh K, Behzadi K, DeCoster TA, Moneim MS, Naraghi FF.

J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Apr;9(2):152-7.

PMID:
7776036
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Treatment of periprosthetic fractures in association with total hip arthroplasty--a retrospective comparison between revision stem and plate fixation.

Jukkala-Partio K, Partio EK, Solovieva S, Paavilainen T, Hirvensalo E, Alho A.

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1998;87(3):229-35.

PMID:
9825069
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk