Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 162

1.

Does segregating variation in sexual or microhabitat preferences lead to non-random mating within a population of Drosophila melanogaster?

Foley BR, Genissel A, Kristy HL, Nuzhdin SV.

Biol Lett. 2010 Feb 23;6(1):102-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0608. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

2.

Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Mallet MA, Chippindale AK.

Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Jun;106(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.148. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

3.

Microhabitat variation and sexual selection can maintain male color polymorphisms.

Chunco AJ, McKinnon JS, Servedio MR.

Evolution. 2007 Nov;61(11):2504-15. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

PMID:
17725638
4.

Sequence polymorphism of candidate behavioural genes in Drosophila melanogaster flies from 'Evolution canyon'.

Zamorzaeva I, Rashkovetsky E, Nevo E, Korol A.

Mol Ecol. 2005 Sep;14(10):3235-45.

PMID:
16101788
5.

Characterizing male-female interactions using natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Reinhart M, Carney T, Clark AG, Fiumera AC.

J Hered. 2015 Jan-Feb;106(1):67-79. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esu076. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

6.

Genetic variation and covariation in male attractiveness and female mating preferences in Drosophila melanogaster.

Ratterman NL, Rosenthal GG, Carney GE, Jones AG.

G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Jan 10;4(1):79-88. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007468.

7.

An evolutionary limit to male mating success.

McGuigan K, Van Homrigh A, Blows MW.

Evolution. 2008 Jun;62(6):1528-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00379.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

PMID:
18363864
8.

Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.

Etges WJ, de Oliveira CC, Gragg E, Ortíz-Barrientos D, Noor MA, Ritchie MG.

Evolution. 2007 May;61(5):1106-19.

PMID:
17492965
10.

Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster.

Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Little MK, Rice WR.

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2165-72. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2272. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

11.

Variation in the male pheromones and mating success of wild caught Drosophila melanogaster.

Scott D, Shields A, Straker M, Dalrymple H, Dhillon PK, Harbinder S.

PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023645. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

12.

Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?

Chenoweth SF, Doughty P, Kokko H.

Ecol Lett. 2006 Feb;9(2):179-84.

PMID:
16958883
13.

Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference.

Narraway C, Hunt J, Wedell N, Hosken DJ.

J Evol Biol. 2010 Dec;23(12):2550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02113.x. Epub 2010 Oct 7.

14.

Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation.

Teotónio H, Chelo IM, Bradić M, Rose MR, Long AD.

Nat Genet. 2009 Feb;41(2):251-7. doi: 10.1038/ng.289. Epub 2009 Jan 11.

PMID:
19136954
15.

Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.

McKean KA, Nunney L.

Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):386-400. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

PMID:
18070086
16.

Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Lüpold S, Pitnick S, Berben KS, Blengini CS, Belote JM, Manier MK.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 25;110(26):10693-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300954110. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

17.
18.

A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Long TA, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR.

PLoS Biol. 2009 Dec;7(12):e1000254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000254. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

19.
20.

Intrasexual competition facilitates the evolution of alternative mating strategies in a colour polymorphic fish.

Hurtado-Gonzales JL, Uy JA.

BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Dec 23;10:391. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-391.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk