Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 158

1.

Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.

Gipson CD, Miller HC, Alessandri JJ, Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

PMID:
19607889
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.

Stagner JP, Laude JR, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Oct;38(4):446-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030321. Erratum in: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jan;39(1):iii.

PMID:
23066982
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.

Bailey JT, Mazur JE.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):409-22.

PMID:
2341823
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.

McMillan DE, Li M.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):55-77.

PMID:
10966096
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.

Friedrich AM, Clement TS, Zentall TR.

Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):337-42.

PMID:
16396080
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement.

Clement TS, Zentall TR.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Jan;28(1):64-74.

PMID:
11868235
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

"Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Clement TS, Feltus JR, Kaiser DH, Zentall TR.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Mar;7(1):100-6.

PMID:
10780022
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.

Zentall TR, Singer RA.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jul;88(1):131-49.

PMID:
17725056
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.

Mazur JE.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77.

PMID:
2002302
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.

Williams BA.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):163-72.

PMID:
8433063
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance.

Nevin JA.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 May;10(3):251-60.

PMID:
6056798
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.

Aum S, Brown BL, Hemmes NS.

Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):187-97. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

PMID:
17157998
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.

Arantes J, Grace RC.

Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):1-11.

PMID:
18318421
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.

Davison M, Baum WM.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):1-24.

PMID:
10966094
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.
16.
17.

Value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event pavlovian conditioning.

Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Roper KL, Kraemer PJ.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jan;22(1):68-75.

PMID:
8568497
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals.

Rayburn-Reeves RM, Laude JR, Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2013 Jan;92:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

PMID:
23123672
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.

Mazur JE.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77.

PMID:
3746189
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.

Spetch ML, Dunn R.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):57-72.

PMID:
3559459
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk