Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 99

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 19398323)

1.

Exploiting structural classifications for function prediction: towards a domain grammar for protein function.

Dessailly BH, Redfern OC, Cuff A, Orengo CA.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Jun;19(3):349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Review.

2.

Protein families and their evolution-a structural perspective.

Orengo CA, Thornton JM.

Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:867-900. Review.

PMID:
15954844
3.

Classification of proteins: available structural space for molecular modeling.

Andreeva A.

Methods Mol Biol. 2012;857:1-31. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_1.

PMID:
22323215
4.

Review: what can structural classifications reveal about protein evolution?

Orengo CA, Sillitoe I, Reeves G, Pearl FM.

J Struct Biol. 2001 May-Jun;134(2-3):145-65. Review.

PMID:
11551176
5.

Classification of protein functional surfaces using structural characteristics.

Tseng YY, Li WH.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1170-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119684109. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

7.

Protein folds, functions and evolution.

Thornton JM, Orengo CA, Todd AE, Pearl FM.

J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):333-42. Review.

PMID:
10529349
8.

CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.

Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM.

Structure. 1997 Aug 15;5(8):1093-108.

PMID:
9309224
9.

A consensus view of fold space: combining SCOP, CATH, and the Dali Domain Dictionary.

Day R, Beck DA, Armen RS, Daggett V.

Protein Sci. 2003 Oct;12(10):2150-60.

10.

Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective.

Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM.

J Mol Biol. 2001 Apr 6;307(4):1113-43.

PMID:
11286560
11.

Exploiting protein structure data to explore the evolution of protein function and biological complexity.

Marsden RL, Ranea JA, Sillero A, Redfern O, Yeats C, Maibaum M, Lee D, Addou S, Reeves GA, Dallman TJ, Orengo CA.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 29;361(1467):425-40. Review.

12.

Population statistics of protein structures: lessons from structural classifications.

Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJ.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Jun;7(3):369-76. Review.

PMID:
9204279
13.

The PAS fold. A redefinition of the PAS domain based upon structural prediction.

Hefti MH, Fran├žoijs KJ, de Vries SC, Dixon R, Vervoort J.

Eur J Biochem. 2004 Mar;271(6):1198-208.

PMID:
15009198
14.

Structural classification of thioredoxin-like fold proteins.

Qi Y, Grishin NV.

Proteins. 2005 Feb 1;58(2):376-88.

PMID:
15558583
15.

Structural classification of small, disulfide-rich protein domains.

Cheek S, Krishna SS, Grishin NV.

J Mol Biol. 2006 May 26;359(1):215-37. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

PMID:
16618491
16.

Contemporary approaches to protein structure classification.

Swindells MB, Orengo CA, Jones DT, Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM.

Bioessays. 1998 Nov;20(11):884-91. Review.

PMID:
9872054
17.

The classification of protein domains.

Marsden RL, Orengo CA.

Methods Mol Biol. 2008;453:123-46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-429-6_5.

PMID:
18712300
18.

Structure-based functional inference in structural genomics.

Kim SH, Shin DH, Choi IG, Schulze-Gahmen U, Chen S, Kim R.

J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003;4(2-3):129-35. Review.

PMID:
14649297
19.

Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).

Foffi G, Pastore A, Piazza F, Temussi PA.

Phys Biol. 2013 Aug 2;10(4):040301. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
23912807
20.

Finding evolutionary relations beyond superfamilies: fold-based superfamilies.

Matsuda K, Nishioka T, Kinoshita K, Kawabata T, Go N.

Protein Sci. 2003 Oct;12(10):2239-51.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk