Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 314

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 19378210)

1.

Speech-driven environmental control systems--a qualitative analysis of users' perceptions.

Judge S, Robertson Z, Hawley M, Enderby P.

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 May;4(3):151-7. doi: 10.1080/17483100802715100.

PMID:
19378210
2.

Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.

Judge S, Townend G.

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):366-81. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12012. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

PMID:
23889833
3.

Use of the magnitude estimation technique for assessing the performance of text-to-speech synthesis systems.

Pavlovic CV, Rossi M, Espesser R.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jan;87(1):373-82.

PMID:
2137144
4.

Factors that influence the performance of experienced speech recognition users.

Koester HH.

Assist Technol. 2006 Spring;18(1):56-76.

PMID:
16796242
5.

A five-layer users' need hierarchy of computer input device selection: a contextual observation survey of computer users with cervical spinal injuries (CSI).

Tsai TH, Nash RJ, Tseng KC.

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 May;4(3):158-80. doi: 10.1080/17483100802543312.

PMID:
19378211
6.

Wheelchair users' perceptions of and experiences with power assist wheels.

Giacobbi PR Jr, Levy CE, Dietrich FD, Winkler SH, Tillman MD, Chow JW.

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;89(3):225-34. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c9d7df.

PMID:
20173426
7.
8.
9.

A novel accelerometer tilt switch device for switch actuation in the patient with profound disability.

Perring S, Summers A, Jones EL, Bowen FJ, Hart K.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jun;84(6):921-3.

PMID:
12808551
10.

Speech-language pathologists' views on mentoring by people who use speech generating devices.

Ballin L, Balandin S, Stancliffe RJ, Togher L.

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Oct;13(5):446-57. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.522254. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

PMID:
20969497
11.

Children's perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings.

Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S.

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 Mar;4(2):95-105. doi: 10.1080/17483100802613701.

PMID:
19253098
12.

The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled.

Craig A, Tran Y, McIsaac P, Boord P.

Med Sci Monit. 2005 Jan;11(1):RA32-9. Review.

PMID:
15614204
13.

Computational modeling of user errors for the design of virtual scanning keyboards.

Bhattacharya S, Basu A, Samanta D.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008 Aug;16(4):400-9. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.925073.

PMID:
18701386
14.

A speech-controlled environmental control system for people with severe dysarthria.

Hawley MS, Enderby P, Green P, Cunningham S, Brownsell S, Carmichael J, Parker M, Hatzis A, O'Neill P, Palmer R.

Med Eng Phys. 2007 Jun;29(5):586-93. Epub 2006 Oct 17.

PMID:
17049905
15.

The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.

Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.

Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):590-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181acfb70.

PMID:
19561509
16.

Disabled access to information technology--a portable adaptable, multipurpose device.

Thornett CE, Langner MC, Brown AW.

J Biomed Eng. 1990 May;12(3):205-8.

PMID:
2140870
18.

Experiment on a novel user input for computer interface utilizing tongue input for the severely disabled.

Kencana AP, Heng J.

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008 Nov;3(6):351-9. doi: 10.1080/17483100802281210.

PMID:
19117196
19.
20.

Effects of perceived disability on persuasiveness of computer-synthesized speech.

Stern SE, Mullennix JW, Wilson SJ.

J Appl Psychol. 2002 Apr;87(2):411-7.

PMID:
12002967
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk