Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 249

1.

[Clinical probability of PE: should we use a clinical prediction rule?].

Le Gal G, Righini M, Perrier A.

Rev Pneumol Clin. 2008 Dec;64(6):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pneumo.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 18. French.

PMID:
19084205
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?

Chunilal SD, Eikelboom JW, Attia J, Miniati M, Panju AA, Simel DL, Ginsberg JS.

JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2849-58. Review.

PMID:
14657070
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J.

Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20.

PMID:
10744147
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.
5.

The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Rodger MA, Maser E, Stiell I, Howley HE, Wells PS.

Thromb Res. 2005;116(2):101-7. Epub 2004 Nov 18.

PMID:
15907523
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

An evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a randomized trial.

Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, Turpie AG, Bates SM, Lee AY, Crowther MA, Weitz JI, Brill-Edwards P, Wells P, Anderson DR, Kovacs MJ, Linkins LA, Julian JA, Bonilla LR, Gent M; Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Study (CANPEDS) Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 6;144(11):812-21.

PMID:
16754923
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive diagnostic aids in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Perrier A, Buswell L, Bounameaux H, Didier D, Morabia A, de Moerloose P, Slosman D, Unger PF, Junod A.

Arch Intern Med. 1997 Nov 10;157(20):2309-16. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med 1998 Mar 9;158(5):541.

PMID:
9361571
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Miniati M, Pistolesi M.

Q J Nucl Med. 2001 Dec;45(4):287-93.

PMID:
11893965
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.

PMID:
19404542
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.

Kabrhel C.

J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;35(4):373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.08.070. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

PMID:
18343077
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model.

Penaloza A, Mélot C, Dochy E, Blocklet D, Gevenois PA, Wautrecht JC, Lheureux P, Motte S.

Thromb Res. 2007;120(2):173-9. Epub 2006 Oct 20.

PMID:
17055556
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study.

Kline JA, Nelson RD, Jackson RE, Courtney DM.

Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Feb;39(2):144-52.

PMID:
11823768
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J.

Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 15;129(12):997-1005.

PMID:
9867786
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

New methods for estimating pretest probability in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Ghali WA, Cornuz J, Perrier A.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001 Sep;7(5):349-53. Review.

PMID:
11584188
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Pretest risk assessment in suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Weiss CR, Haponik EF, Diette GB, Merriman B, Scatarige JC, Fishman EK.

Acad Radiol. 2008 Jan;15(1):3-14.

PMID:
18078902
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Diagnostic management of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Huisman MV, Klok FA.

J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jul;7 Suppl 1:312-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03386.x. Review.

PMID:
19630824
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Clinically suspected acute recurrent pulmonary embolism: a diagnostic challenge.

Nijkeuter M, Kwakkel-van Erp H, Söhne M, Tick LW, Kruip MJ, Ullmann EF, Kramer MH, Büller HR, Prins MH, Leebeek FW, Huisman MV; Christopher Study Investigators.

Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jun;97(6):944-8.

PMID:
17549296
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The importance of clinical probability assessment in interpreting a normal d-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Gibson NS, Sohne M, Gerdes VE, Nijkeuter M, Buller HR.

Chest. 2008 Oct;134(4):789-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0344. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

PMID:
18641091
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution.

Moores LK, Collen JF, Woods KM, Shorr AF.

Thromb Res. 2004;113(1):1-6.

PMID:
15081559
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the simplify D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients.

Kline JA, Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, Mitchell AM.

Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1417-23.

PMID:
16778257
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk