Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 457

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 18928974)

1.

A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.

Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, Fowler WC.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):360.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.012.

PMID:
18928974
2.

Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.

Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, Mancini E, Sperduti I, Patrizi L, Saltari M, Vincenzoni C, Baiocco E, Vizza E.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 May 9. pii: S0748-7983(15)00428-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.020. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26002986
3.

Postoperative pain scores and narcotic use in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer staging.

Turner TB, Habib AS, Broadwater G, Valea FA, Fleming ND, Ehrisman JA, Di Santo N, Havrilesky LJ.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May 9. pii: S1553-4650(15)00402-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.003. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25967934
4.

EARLY STAGE ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: LAPAROSCOPY VS LAPAROTOMY: IGCS-0081 Uterine Cancer, including Sarcoma.

Alessandria S, Norese G, Gorosito F, Lange MJ, Nölting M, Bermudez A.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25 Suppl 1:70. No abstract available.

PMID:
25955946
5.

Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience.

Frey MK, Lin JF, Stewart LE, Makaroun L, Panico VJ, Holcomb K.

J Reprod Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(3-4):127-34.

PMID:
25898475
6.

Robotics versus conventional laparoscopy for endometrial cancer: Where are we now?

Oehler MK.

Maturitas. 2015 Jun;81(2):241-2. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 2. No abstract available.

PMID:
25890588
7.

Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer.

Chen CH, Chiu LH, Chen HH, Chan C, Liu WM.

Int J Med Robot. 2015 Mar 25. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1655. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25808671
8.

Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison.

Woods DL, McAndrew T, Nevadunsky N, Hou JY, Goldberg G, Yi-Shin Kuo D, Isani S.

Int J Med Robot. 2015 Feb 22. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1640. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25708320
9.

Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy.

Doo DW, Guntupalli SR, Corr BR, Sheeder J, Davidson SA, Behbakht K, Jarrett MJ, Guy MS.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 12. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25672563
10.

Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer.

Stephan JM, Goodheart MJ, McDonald M, Hansen J, Reyes HD, Button A, Bender D.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):49.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.052. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

PMID:
25644437
11.

Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.

Kim SM, Park EK, Jeung IC, Kim CJ, Lee YS.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

PMID:
25488157
12.

Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: a cohort study.

Chiou HY, Chiu LH, Chen CH, Yen YK, Chang CW, Liu WM.

Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

PMID:
25463760
13.

The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.

Scalici J, Laughlin BB, Finan MA, Wang B, Rocconi RP.

Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Mar;136(3):512-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

PMID:
25462206
14.

[Uterine cancer].

Isaka K, Kato R, Ito H.

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(11):1354-7. Japanese.

PMID:
25434437
15.

Prospective randomized study comparing robotic-assisted hysterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy with traditional laparotomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma -initial Indian experience.

Somashekhar SP, Jaka RC, Zaveri SS.

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;5(3):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s13193-014-0321-8. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

PMID:
25419071
16.

Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review.

Rabinovich A.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3517-9. Epub 2014 Oct 25. Review.

PMID:
25344420
17.

Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

Ran L, Jin J, Xu Y, Bu Y, Song F.

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108361. eCollection 2014.

18.

Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.

Penner KR, Fleming ND, Barlavi L, Axtell AE, Lentz SE.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):186.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

PMID:
25132462
19.

Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.

Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim HJ, Kim YT.

Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1222-30. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1222.

20.

Comparison of reoperation rates, perioperative outcomes in women with endometrial cancer when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to laparoscopy.

Boosz A, Haeberle L, Renner SP, Thiel FC, Mehlhorn G, Beckmann MW, Mueller A.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Dec;290(6):1215-20. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3347-9. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

PMID:
25009071
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk