Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 848

1.

The values of estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated with creatinine and cystatin C based equations in healthy adults.

Dajak M, Ignjatović S, Jovicić S, Majkić-Singh N.

Clin Lab. 2008;54(5-6):153-9.

PMID:
18780660
2.
3.
4.
5.

Performance of the creatinine-based and the cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations in a heterogenous sample of patients referred for nuclear GFR testing.

Huang SH, Macnab JJ, Sontrop JM, Filler G, Gallo K, Lindsay RM, Clark WF.

Transl Res. 2011 Jun;157(6):357-67. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

PMID:
21575920
6.

New predictive equations improve monitoring of kidney function in patients with diabetes.

Beauvieux MC, Le Moigne F, Lasseur C, Raffaitin C, Perlemoine C, Barthe N, Chauveau P, Combe C, Gin H, Rigalleau V.

Diabetes Care. 2007 Aug;30(8):1988-94. Epub 2007 May 29.

PMID:
17536079
7.

A Comparison of GFR estimating formulae based upon s-cystatin C and s-creatinine and a combination of the two.

Tidman M, Sjöström P, Jones I.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jan;23(1):154-60. Epub 2007 Oct 2. Review.

8.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods.

White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, Dinh L, Filler G, Lepage N, Knoll GA.

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Dec;16(12):3763-70. Epub 2005 Oct 19.

9.

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate with creatinine-based versus cystatin C-based equations in kidney transplant recipients.

Savaj S, Shoushtarizadeh T, Abbasi MA, Razavimanesh SH, Ghods AJ.

Iran J Kidney Dis. 2009 Oct;3(4):234-8.

10.
11.

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function.

Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Jul;21(7):1855-62. Epub 2006 Mar 8.

13.

Variation of serum creatinine, cystatin C, and creatinine clearance tests in persons with normal renal function.

Toffaletti JG, McDonnell EH.

Clin Chim Acta. 2008 Sep;395(1-2):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.05.020. Epub 2008 Jun 3.

PMID:
18573244
15.

Cystatin C-based equations in renal transplantation: moving toward a better glomerular filtration rate prediction?

Maillard N, Mariat C, Bonneau C, Mehdi M, Thibaudin L, Laporte S, Alamartine E, Chamson A, Berthoux F.

Transplantation. 2008 Jun 27;85(12):1855-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181744225.

PMID:
18580481
16.

Discrepancies between creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations in estimating prevalence of stage 3 chronic kidney disease in an elderly population.

Delanaye P, Cavalier E, Saint-Remy A, Lutteri L, Krzesinski JM.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(3):344-9. doi: 10.1080/00365510802609856.

PMID:
19051098
17.

Chronic kidney disease stage in renal transplantation classification using cystatin C and creatinine-based equations.

White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, Dinh L, Filler G, Lepage N, Knoll GA.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Oct;22(10):3013-20. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

18.
19.

Measurement of the kidney function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: plasma cystatin C versus 51Cr-EDTA clearance.

Karstila K, Harmoinen AP, Lehtimäki TJ, Korpela MM, Mustonen JT, Saha HH.

Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;108(4):c284-90. doi: 10.1159/000127362. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

PMID:
18434750
20.

Simple cystatin C formula compared to sophisticated CKD-EPI formulas for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in the elderly.

Bevc S, Hojs R, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L.

Ther Apher Dial. 2011 Jun;15(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00948.x.

PMID:
21624073
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk