Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 198

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 18639208)

1.

Effect of physician gender and specialty on utilization of hysterectomy in New York, 2001-2005.

Gretz H, Bradley WH, Zakashansky K, Nezhat F, Bohren DL, Kreiger K, Rubin E, Sokolow A.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):347.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18639208
2.

Patient clinical factors influencing use of hysterectomy in New York, 2001-2005.

Gretz H, Bradley WH, Zakashansky K, Nezhat F, Rahaman J, Chuang L, Bohren DL, Kreiger K, Rubin E, Sokolow A.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):349.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

PMID:
18667172
3.

Discussion: 'Physician gender, specialty, and hysterectomy utilization' by Gretz et al.

Jenkins T, Greer J, Wetta L, Doss A.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):e1-4, 438-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.018.

PMID:
18928968
4.

Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.

Huang CC, Wu MP, Huang YT.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Apr;161(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.024. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

PMID:
22300773
5.

The impact of nonclinical factors on practice variations: the case of hysterectomies.

Geller SE, Burns LR, Brailer DJ.

Health Serv Res. 1996 Feb;30(6):729-50.

6.

Charges for obstetric liability insurance and discontinuation of obstetric practice in New York.

Grumbach K, Vranizan K, Rennie D, Luft HS.

J Fam Pract. 1997 Jan;44(1):61-70.

PMID:
9010372
7.

Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy--a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists.

Persson P, Hellborg T, Brynhildsen J, Fredrikson M, Kjølhede P.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(3):267-74. doi: 10.1080/00016340802649824.

PMID:
19241224
8.
9.

Factors affecting prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women.

Gross CP, Nicholson W, Powe NR.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;94(6):962-8.

PMID:
10576183
10.

The effect of physician characteristics on clinical behavior: cesarean section in New York State.

Tussing AD, Wojtowycz MA.

Soc Sci Med. 1993 Nov;37(10):1251-60.

PMID:
8272903
11.

Results of the live survey in Las Vegas, 2008, and the response of the AAGL.

Yeung PP Jr, Pasic RP.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):519-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.014. No abstract available. Erratum in: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):134.

PMID:
19835792
12.

A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.

Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J.

BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):492-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01966.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

PMID:
19016683
13.

Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity.

Boyd LR, Novetsky AP, Curtin JP.

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):909-15. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f395d9.

PMID:
20859155
14.

Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S, Jackson R, Richter HE, Chan J, Kuppermann M.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;113(6):1259-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a66c42. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):696-7.

PMID:
19461420
15.

Abdominal hysterectomy practice patterns in the United States.

Sills ES, Saini J, Steiner CA, McGee M 3rd, Gretz HF 3rd.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Dec;63(3):277-83.

PMID:
9989898
16.

Gynecologists' sex, clinical beliefs, and hysterectomy rates.

Bickell NA, Earp JA, Garrett JM, Evans AT.

Am J Public Health. 1994 Oct;84(10):1649-52.

18.

Route of hysterectomy influence and teaching hospital status.

Tu FF, Beaumont JL, Senapati S, Gordon TE.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;114(1):73-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aa9597.

PMID:
19546761
19.

Factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy.

Shao JB, Wong F.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Aug;41(3):303-6.

PMID:
11592545
20.

Medicaid claims data comparisons for nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Birkholz G, Viens DC.

J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1999 Jan;11(1):3-10. No abstract available.

PMID:
10504916
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk