Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 596

1.

The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.

Jowsey IR, Clapp CJ, Safford B, Gibbons BT, Basketter DA.

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008;27(2):67-75. doi: 10.1080/15569520801904655.

PMID:
18568891
2.
3.

The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.

Lea LJ, Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Basketter DA.

Am J Contact Dermat. 1999 Dec;10(4):213-8.

PMID:
10594297
4.

Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.

Hilton J, Dearman RJ, Harvey P, Evans P, Basketter DA, Kimber I.

Am J Contact Dermat. 1998 Mar;9(1):29-33.

PMID:
9471984
5.

Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.

Basketter DA, Balikie L, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Harvey P, Evans P, White IR, Rycroft RJ.

Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Jun;42(6):344-8.

PMID:
10871098
6.

Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.

Kimber I, Basketter DA, Berthold K, Butler M, Garrigue JL, Lea L, Newsome C, Roggeband R, Steiling W, Stropp G, Waterman S, Wiemann C.

Toxicol Sci. 2001 Feb;59(2):198-208. Review.

7.

The local lymph node assay: past, present and future.

Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Basketter DA, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF.

Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Dec;47(6):315-28. Review.

PMID:
12581276
8.

Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.

Basketter DA, Clapp C, Jefferies D, Safford B, Ryan CA, Gerberick F, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.

Contact Dermatitis. 2005 Nov;53(5):260-7.

PMID:
16283904
9.
10.

The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.

Betts CJ, Beresford L, Dearman RJ, Lalko J, Api AP, Kimber I.

Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Feb;56(2):70-5.

PMID:
17244073
11.

Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.

Ryan CA, Cruse LW, Skinner RA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Gerberick GF.

Food Chem Toxicol. 2002 Nov;40(11):1719-25.

PMID:
12176099
12.

Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay.

Basketter DA, Wright ZM, Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, White IR.

Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Aug;45(2):89-94.

PMID:
11553118
13.

Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay.

Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I.

Food Chem Toxicol. 2001 Jun;39(6):621-7. Review.

PMID:
11346493
14.

A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses.

Basketter DA, Lea LJ, Dickens A, Briggs D, Pate I, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.

J Appl Toxicol. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4):261-6.

PMID:
10439340
15.

Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations.

Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Lea LJ, Basketter DA, Kimber I.

J Appl Toxicol. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4):255-60.

PMID:
10439339
16.

Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.

Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.

Methods. 2007 Jan;41(1):54-60. Review.

PMID:
16938465
17.

Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.

Takeyoshi M, Noda S, Yamazaki S, Kakishima H, Yamasaki K, Kimber I.

J Appl Toxicol. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):77-81.

PMID:
14745850
18.

The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.

Basketter DA, Gerberick F, Kimber I.

Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Aug;57(2):70-5. Review.

PMID:
17627643
19.

Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.

Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Basketter DA, Wright Z, Marks JG.

Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Sep;12(3):156-61.

PMID:
11526521
20.

Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.

Dearman RJ, Betts CJ, Farr C, McLaughlin J, Berdasco N, Wiench K, Kimber I.

Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):242-7.

PMID:
17868217
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk