Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 1691

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 18439499)

1.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
2.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.

Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):698-705.

PMID:
17980329
3.

Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?

Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

PMID:
19168206
4.

What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?

Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.015.

PMID:
18722971
5.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
6.

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18829091
7.

Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE 4th, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18834620
8.

Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.

Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Mendivil A, Rossi E, Hanna R.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):585-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b47030.

PMID:
19701039
9.

Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.

Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):60-3.

PMID:
16431325
10.

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

El-Mowafi D, Madkour W, Lall C, Wenger JM.

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 May;11(2):175-80.

PMID:
15200770
11.

Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Nawfal AK, Orady M, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

PMID:
21411379
12.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.

Kilic GS, Moore G, Elbatanony A, Radecki C, Phelps JY, Borahay MA.

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:683703. doi: 10.1155/2011/683703. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

13.

A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

PMID:
19249082
14.

A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jun;113(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

PMID:
19345987
15.

Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR, Pitter MC, Giep HN, Giep BN, Grogg TW, Shanbour KA, Goff DW, Hubert HB.

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):535-42. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad.

PMID:
20177284
16.

Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.

Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Cammarano C.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2.

PMID:
15284779
17.

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, Wang AJ, Stifelman MD.

J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.037. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

PMID:
19616229
18.

Robotic adnexectomy compared with laparoscopy for adnexal mass.

Magrina JF, Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, Kho RM.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):581-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b05d97.

PMID:
19701038
19.

[A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].

Aniuliene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(2):118-24. Lithuanian.

20.

Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL.

JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.

PMID:
23423414
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk