Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 305

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 18387004)

1.

Risk prediction: a review of the literature.

Woods P, Lasiuk GC.

J Forensic Nurs. 2008;4(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2008.00001.x. Review.

PMID:
18387004
2.

Risk assessment of forensic patients: nurses' role.

Encinares M, McMaster JJ, McNamee J.

J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2005 Mar;43(3):30-6. Review.

PMID:
15794530
3.

[Assessment and management of the risk for violence. An overview of the literature].

Tholen AJ.

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(3):173-82. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
19536973
4.

False prediction of future dangerousness: error rates and psychopathy checklist--revised.

Freedman D.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2001;29(1):89-95. No abstract available.

PMID:
11302393
5.

Risk appraisal and management of violent behavior.

Harris GT, Rice ME.

Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Sep;48(9):1168-76. Review.

PMID:
9285978
6.
7.

Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.

Odeh MS, Zeiss RA, Huss MT.

Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(2):147-56.

PMID:
16557618
8.

Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the "actuarial versus clinical" assessment debate.

Buchanan A.

Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Feb;59(2):184-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.2.184. Review.

PMID:
18245161
9.
10.

Dangerousness and risk assessment: the state of the art.

Bauer A, Rosca P, Khawalled R, Gruzniewski A, Grinshpoon A.

Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2003;40(3):182-90. Review.

PMID:
14619677
11.
12.

Identifying risk factors in stalking: a review of current research.

McEwan T, Mullen PE, Purcell R.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):1-9. Epub 2006 Dec 8. Review.

PMID:
17157379
13.

Gender and risk assessment accuracy: underestimating women's violence potential.

Skeem J, Schubert C, Stowman S, Beeson S, Mulvey E, Gardner W, Lidz C.

Law Hum Behav. 2005 Apr;29(2):173-86.

PMID:
15912722
14.

Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.

Elwood RW.

Sex Abuse. 2009 Dec;21(4):395-411. doi: 10.1177/1079063209347723. Review.

PMID:
19901235
15.

Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme.

Webster CD, Nicholls TL, Martin ML, Desmarais SL, Brink J.

Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(6):747-66.

PMID:
17171764
16.

[Forensic assessment of violence risk].

Pujol Robinat A, Mohíno Justes S, Gómez-Durán EL.

Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Mar;142 Suppl 2:16-23. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(14)70067-3. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
24913749
17.

The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.

Berlin FS, Galbreath NW, Geary B, McGlone G.

Sex Abuse. 2003 Oct;15(4):377-82.

PMID:
14571541
18.

Routine violence risk assessment in community forensic mental healthcare.

van den Brink RH, Hooijschuur A, van Os TW, Savenije W, Wiersma D.

Behav Sci Law. 2010 May-Jun;28(3):396-410. doi: 10.1002/bsl.904.

PMID:
19908211
19.

Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence of patients with mental illnesses.

Gardner W, Lidz CW, Mulvey EP, Shaw EC.

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):602-9.

PMID:
8698955
20.

The assessment of dangerousness and predictions of violence: recent research and future prospects.

Litwack TR, Kirschner SM, Wack RC.

Psychiatr Q. 1993 Fall;64(3):245-73. Review.

PMID:
8356181
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk