Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 305

1.

Reproducibility of saline contrast sonohysterography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Beemsterboer SN, Thurkow AL, Verstraeten R, Brölmann HA.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;31(4):445-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.5287.

PMID:
18383471
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

Two- and three-dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography: interobserver agreement, agreement with hysteroscopy and diagnosis of endometrial malignancy.

Opolskiene G, Sladkevicius P, Valentin L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;33(5):574-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.6350.

PMID:
19360790
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Saline contrast sonohysterography as first-line investigation for women with uterine bleeding.

Bernard JP, Lécuru F, Darles C, Robin F, de Bievre P, Taurelle R.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;10(2):121-5.

PMID:
9286021
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH): comparison of two diagnostic techniques.

Bij de Vaate AJ, Brölmann HA, van der Slikke JW, Emanuel MH, Huirne JA.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):486-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7594.

PMID:
20178106
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.
6.

Transvaginal sonography combined with saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluating the uterine cavity in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Dueholm M, Forman A, Jensen ML, Laursen H, Kracht P.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;18(1):54-61.

PMID:
11489227
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
7.

Pain experienced during transvaginal ultrasound, saline contrast sonohysterography, hysteroscopy and office sampling: a comparative study.

Van den Bosch T, Verguts J, Daemen A, Gevaert O, Domali E, Claerhout F, Vandenbroucke V, De Moor B, Deprest J, Timmerman D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):346-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.5263.

PMID:
18307203
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

Gel infusion sonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity.

Van den Bosch T, Betsas G, Van Schoubroeck D, Daemen A, Vandenbroucke V, Cornelis A, De Moor B, Deprest J, Timmerman D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;34(6):711-4. doi: 10.1002/uog.7463.

PMID:
19902475
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.
10.

Reproducibility of endometrial vascular patterns in endometrial disease as assessed by transvaginal power Doppler sonography in women with postmenopausal bleeding.

Alcázar JL, Ajossa S, Floris S, Bargellini R, Gerada M, Guerriero S.

J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Feb;25(2):159-63.

PMID:
16439778
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.

Reproducibility of the measurement of submucous fibroid protrusion into the uterine cavity using three-dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography.

Lee C, Salim R, Ofili-Yebovi D, Yazbek J, Davies A, Jurkovic D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;28(6):837-41.

PMID:
17019741
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears.

Gupta DK, Komaromy-Hiller G, Raab SS, Nath ME.

Acta Cytol. 2001 Sep-Oct;45(5):697-703.

PMID:
11575646
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The reproducibility of the results of transvaginal sonography of the uterus in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Emanuel MH, Ankum WM, Verdel MJ, Hart AA.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;8(5):346-9.

PMID:
8978011
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
14.

ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology. Number 3, September 2003. Saline infusion sonohysterography.

Breitkopf D, Goldstein SR, Seeds JW; ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice.

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;102(3):659-62.

PMID:
12962967
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

[Accuracy of transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in diagnosis of intrauterine pathology].

Bartkowiak R, Kamiński P, Wielgoś M, Marianowski L.

Ginekol Pol. 2003 Mar;74(3):203-9. Polish.

PMID:
12916257
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers.

Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski V, Chak A, Mallery S, Catalano MF, Wiersema MJ, Bhutani MS, Ciaccia D, Kochman ML, Gress FG, Van Velse A, Hoffman BJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Mar;53(3):294-9.

PMID:
11231386
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Sonohysterographic endometrial sampling and hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy: a comparative study.

Leone FP, Carsana L, Lanzani C, Vago G, Ferrazzi E.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;29(4):443-8.

PMID:
17390311
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.

MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.

Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Spijkerboer AM, Moolhuijzen AD, Birnie E, Ankum WM, Reekers JA.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):260-8. Epub 2007 Dec 4.

PMID:
18057985
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Saline contrast sonohysterography in the preoperative assessment of benign intrauterine disorders.

Bernard JP, Rizk E, Camatte S, Robin F, Taurelle R, Lecuru F.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;17(2):145-9.

PMID:
11251924
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
20.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography: intraobserver and interobserver agreement using scoring systems for classification of anal sphincter defects.

Norderval S, Dehli T, Vonen B.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):337-43. doi: 10.1002/uog.6295.

PMID:
19224542
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk