Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 347

1.

Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers.

Sheran J, Dachman AH.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):593-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.11.009.

PMID:
18359448
3.

Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.

Nagata K, Okawa T, Honma A, Endo S, Kudo SE, Yoshida H.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Jul;16(7):780-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.027. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

PMID:
19375954
4.

Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of contrast enhanced CT colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer.

Ozsunar Y, Coskun G, Delibaş N, Uz B, Yükselen V.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

PMID:
18597964
5.

Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet.

Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, Merola AA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2695-700.

PMID:
16319757
7.

Performance of computed tomographic colonography for the screening of colorectal polyp in acromegalic patients: a prospective study.

Ramos O Jr, Boguszewski CL, Teixeira S, De Bem R, Parolim B, Prolla JC.

Arq Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr-Jun;46(2):90-6.

8.

Surfing for back pain patients: the nature and quality of back pain information on the Internet.

Li L, Irvin E, Guzmán J, Bombardier C.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 1;26(5):545-57.

PMID:
11242383
9.

Differences in the quality of information on the internet about lung cancer between the United States and Japan.

Goto Y, Sekine I, Sekiguchi H, Yamada K, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Tamura T.

J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Jul;4(7):829-33. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a76fe1.

PMID:
19550244
10.

Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.

Sambandam SN, Ramasamy V, Priyanka P, Ilango B.

Arthroscopy. 2007 May;23(5):509-513.e2.

PMID:
17478282
11.

Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the internet.

Beaton C, Codd RJ, Holland PA, Gateley CA.

Breast J. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):366-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00599.x.

PMID:
18537915
12.

CT colonography: an update.

Aschoff AJ, Ernst AS, Brambs HJ, Juchems MS.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Mar;18(3):429-37. Epub 2007 Sep 25. Review.

PMID:
17899101
13.
14.

Healthcare @ the speed of thought.

Cochrane JD.

Integr Healthc Rep. 1999 May:1-14, 16-7.

PMID:
10557655
15.

The Internet and patient education--resources and their reliability: focus on a select urologic topic.

Sacchetti P, Zvara P, Plante MK.

Urology. 1999 Jun;53(6):1117-20.

PMID:
10367838
16.

A critical evaluation of Web sites offering patient information on tinnitus.

Kieran SM, Skinner LJ, Donnelly M, Smyth DA.

Ear Nose Throat J. 2010 Jan;89(1):E11-4.

PMID:
20155682
17.

Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening.

Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, Dekker HM, Thomeer M, van Marrewijk CJ, Hol L, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, Bossuyt PM, Dekker E, Stoker J.

Gut. 2009 Sep;58(9):1242-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.176867. Epub 2009 Jul 21.

18.

Computed tomographic colonography in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Sabanli M, Balasingam A, Bailey W, Eglinton T, Hider P, Frizelle FA.

Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1291-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7098.

PMID:
20602504
19.
20.

[CT-colonography after incomplete conventional colonoscopy].

Brisling S, Adamsen S, Nørgaard H, Brink L, Hermann KL, Arnesen RB.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Apr 28;170(18):1563-6. Danish.

PMID:
18454928
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk