Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

Effects of laparoscopy on surgical discharge practice patterns.

Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Gilbert SM, Strope S, Miller DC.

Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1029-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.066. Epub 2008 Mar 12.

PMID:
18336886
2.

Impact of surgical volume on mortality and length of stay after nephrectomy.

Taub DA, Miller DC, Cowan JA, Dimick JB, Montie JE, Wei JT.

Urology. 2004 May;63(5):862-7.

PMID:
15134966
3.
4.
5.

Understanding differences between high and low volume hospitals for radical prostatectomy.

Siu W, Daignault S, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Gilbert S, Weizer AZ, Ye Z, Hollenbeck BK.

Urol Oncol. 2008 May-Jun;26(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

PMID:
18452816
6.

Differential adoption of laparoscopy by treatment indication.

Morris DS, Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Dunn RL, Roberts WW, Wolf JS Jr, Hollenbeck BK.

J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):2109-13; discussion 2113. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

PMID:
17870127
7.

Hospital characteristics and use of innovative surgical therapies among patients with kidney cancer.

Miller DC, Daignault S, Wolf JS Jr, Hafez KS, Kieran K, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK.

Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):372-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816099a7.

PMID:
18362816
8.

Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.

Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M.

Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):819-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d950e.

PMID:
18438119
9.

Use of nephrectomy at select medical centers--a case of follow the crowd?

Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Wei JT.

J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):670-4.

PMID:
16407022
10.

Comparison of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in obese and nonobese patients: outcomes stratified by body mass index.

Feder MT, Patel MB, Melman A, Ghavamian R, Hoenig DM.

J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 May 15.

PMID:
18485408
11.

Understanding variation in the adoption of a new technology in surgery.

Hollingsworth JM, Krein SL, Dunn RL, Wolf JS Jr, Hollenbeck BK.

Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):366-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815dc5c0.

PMID:
18362815
12.

Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients.

Dolce CJ, Keller JE, Walters KC, Griffin D, Norton HJ, Heniford BT, Kercher KW.

Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1564-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0340-7. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

PMID:
19263157
13.

Abdominal hysterectomy practice patterns in the United States.

Sills ES, Saini J, Steiner CA, McGee M 3rd, Gretz HF 3rd.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Dec;63(3):277-83.

PMID:
9989898
14.

Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.

Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Walz J, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Gurriet B, De Laparrent T, Blache JL.

Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2743-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0116-5. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

PMID:
18814002
15.

A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.

D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Sun L, Dahm P, Habib AS.

J Clin Anesth. 2009 Aug;21(5):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

PMID:
19700296
16.

Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Goshima KR, Mills JL Sr, Awari K, Pike SL, Hughes JD.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

PMID:
18411029
17.

[Nephrectomy in denmark 2002-2005].

Firoozfard B, Christensen TH, Bendixen A, Nordling J, Kehlet H.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Apr 10;168(15):1526-8. Danish.

PMID:
16640972
18.

Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better?

Konety BR, Allareddy V, Modak S, Smith B.

J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2006-12.

19.

Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.

Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.

PMID:
19835801
20.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk