Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 1923

1.

Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.

Wagner W, Plinkert PK, Vonthein R, Plontke SK.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Oct;265(10):1165-72. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0593-0. Epub 2008 Feb 27.

PMID:
18301908
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.

Gorga MP, Nelson K, Davis T, Dorn PA, Neely ST.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Apr;107(4):2128-35.

PMID:
10790038
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.

Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.

Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):875-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318181ad99.

PMID:
18753950
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):1165-86.

PMID:
16411804
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.

Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):778-92.

PMID:
17982366
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.

Nieschalk M, Hustert B, Stoll W.

Audiology. 1998 Mar-Apr;37(2):83-99.

PMID:
9547922
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.

Uchida Y, Ando F, Shimokata H, Sugiura S, Ueda H, Nakashima T.

Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):176-84.

PMID:
18595184
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Vonthein R, Zenner HP.

Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):378-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816906e7.

PMID:
18382378
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.

Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):239-49. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182321da4.

PMID:
21918451
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.

Kossowski M, Mom T, Guitton M, Poncet JL, Bonfils P, Avan P.

Audiology. 2001 May-Jun;40(3):113-22.

PMID:
11465293
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

[Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].

Hoth S.

Laryngorhinootologie. 1996 Dec;75(12):709-18. German.

PMID:
9081275
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.

Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.

Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):466-79.

PMID:
16957498
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.

Mills DM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2586-602.

PMID:
10830382
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.
15.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dierking DM, Dorn PA, Hoover BM, Fitzpatrick DF.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):263-78.

PMID:
12880040
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Arnold DJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Feb;125(2):215-22.

PMID:
10037289
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.

Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA.

Ear Hear. 1999 Aug;20(4):345-62.

PMID:
10466570
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.

Sutton LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Whitehead ML.

Hear Res. 1994 May;75(1-2):161-74.

PMID:
8071143
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.

Oswald JA, Rosner T, Janssen T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jun;119(6):3886-95.

PMID:
16838532
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk