Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 463

1.

Evaluation of the synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens.

Sergienko N.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):8-9; author reply 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.08.044. No abstract available.

PMID:
18165063
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 1: optical and biomechanical principles and design considerations.

McLeod SD, Vargas LG, Portney V, Ting A.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):37-46.

PMID:
17189791
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.

Ossma IL, Galvis A, Vargas LG, Trager MJ, Vagefi MR, McLeod SD.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):47-52.

PMID:
17189792
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens.

Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Oct;36(10):1656-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.04.040.

PMID:
20870110
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Clinical evaluation of the Softec HD aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens.

Craig JP, Shah S, Wolffsohn JS.

Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;39(3):281-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02453.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
20973904
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Further assessment of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision.

Xiao J, Li S, Jiang C.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 May;39(5):816-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.010. No abstract available.

PMID:
23608583
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Reply: Further assessment of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision.

Beiko GH.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 May;39(5):817. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.009. No abstract available.

PMID:
23608585
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Performance of the 1CU accommodating IOL.

Galand A.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jan;32(1):3; author reply 3-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
16516759
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

[Multifocal intraocular lenses].

Zelichowska B, Rekas M, Stankiewicz A.

Klin Oczna. 2006;108(4-6):247-52. Review. Polish.

PMID:
17020006
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Double pass-technique limitations for evaluation of optical performance after diffractive IOL implantation.

Gatinel D.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):621-2; author reply 622. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.008. No abstract available.

PMID:
21333892
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Long-term reading performance in patients with bilateral dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses.

Bohórquez V, Alarcon R.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.061.

PMID:
21029896
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

A dual optic accommodating foldable intraocular lens.

McLeod SD, Portney V, Ting A.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;87(9):1083-5.

PMID:
12928270
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Spherical aberration and depth of focus.

Beiko G.

Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1641; author reply 1641-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.031. No abstract available.

PMID:
18762087
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.

Pepose JS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):969-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.022. No abstract available.

PMID:
23688902
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Reply: comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.

Beiko G.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):970. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.021. No abstract available.

PMID:
23688903
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Intraocular lens power calculation in phacovitrectomy patients.

Partwardhan AA.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):529; author reply 529-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.042. No abstract available.

PMID:
18361959
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

US FDA clinical trial of the Tetraflex potentially accommodating IOL: comparison to concurrent age-matched monofocal controls.

Sanders DR, Sanders ML; Tetraflex Presbyopic IOL Study Group.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct;26(10):723-30. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091209-06. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

PMID:
20027986
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic.

Langenbucher A, Reese S, Jakob C, Seitz B.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):450-7.

PMID:
15315660
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Deliberate use of unequal adds with aspheric ReSTOR intraocular lens.

Osher RH.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1646. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.009. No abstract available.

PMID:
19683171
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk