Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Simon HJ, Levitt H.

Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):259-72. Review.

PMID:
18003869
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Hearing assistive technology considerations for older individuals with dual sensory loss.

Kricos PB.

Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):273-9. Review.

PMID:
18080391
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

An overview of dual sensory impairment in older adults: perspectives for rehabilitation.

Saunders GH, Echt KV.

Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):243-58. Review.

PMID:
18003868
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

Psychosocial adaptations to dual sensory loss in middle and late adulthood.

Brennan M, Bally SJ.

Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):281-300. Review.

PMID:
18003870
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Auditory and visual lexical neighborhoods in audiovisual speech perception.

Tye-Murray N, Sommers M, Spehar B.

Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):233-41.

PMID:
18003867
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Dual sensory loss: overview of problems, visual assessment, and rehabilitation.

Brabyn JA, Schneck ME, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Lott LA.

Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):219-26. Review.

PMID:
18003865
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Kulkarni PN, Pandey PC, Jangamashetti DS.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Apr;51(4):334-44. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.642012. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

PMID:
22201526
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

[Auditory guidance systems for the visually impaired people].

He J, Nie M, Luo L, Tong S, Niu J, Zhu Y.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Apr;27(2):467-70. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
20481341
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1419-32. doi: 10.1121/1.4864786.

PMID:
24606279
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.

Moore BC, Popelka GR.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Oct;52(10):678-86. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.809483. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23859058
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Simpson A.

Trends Amplif. 2009 Jun;13(2):87-106. doi: 10.1177/1084713809336421. Review.

PMID:
19447764
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Parsa V, Scollie S, Glista D, Seelisch A.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):54-68. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480856.

PMID:
23539261
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
13.

Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and spatial hearing considerations associated with visual impairment in adults: an overview.

Blumsack JT.

Am J Audiol. 2003 Dec;12(2):76-83. Review.

PMID:
14964322
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Oxenham AJ.

Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):316-31. doi: 10.1177/1084713808325881. Epub 2008 Oct 30. Review.

PMID:
18974203
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.
16.

Musicians and hearing aid design--is your hearing instrument being overworked?

Schmidt M.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):140-5. doi: 10.1177/1084713812471586.

PMID:
23258617
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.

Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.

Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):e52-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431.

PMID:
23416751
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.

DeLiang Wang.

Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):332-53. doi: 10.1177/1084713808326455. Epub 2008 Oct 30. Review.

PMID:
18974204
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Nittrouer S, Caldwell-Tarr A, Tarr E, Lowenstein JH, Rice C, Moberly AC.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Aug;52(8):513-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.792957.

PMID:
23834373
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers.

Boyd AW, Whitmer WM, Soraghan JJ, Akeroyd MA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Mar;131(3):EL268-74. doi: 10.1121/1.3687015.

PMID:
22423819
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk