Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 173

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 17698125)

1.

Patient identification error among prostate needle core biopsy specimens--are we ready for a DNA time-out?

Suba EJ, Pfeifer JD, Raab SS.

J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1245-8. Epub 2007 Aug 14.

PMID:
17698125
2.
3.

Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.

Divrik RT, Eroglu A, Sahin A, Zorlu F, Ozen H.

Urol Oncol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):376-82.

PMID:
17826653
4.
5.
6.

Correlation between prostate needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: can we predict pathological outcome?

Zam NA, Tan PH, Sim HG, Lau WK, Yip SK, Cheng CW.

Pathology. 2008 Oct;40(6):586-91. doi: 10.1080/00313020802320671.

PMID:
18752125
7.

Minute focus of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Montanari E, Del Nero A, Gazzano G, Mangiarotti B, Bernardini P, Longo F, Cordima G, Itri E.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009 Mar;81(1):9-12.

PMID:
19499751
8.

Invasion of fat justifies assignment of stage pT3a in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Sung MT, Eble JN, Cheng L.

Pathology. 2006 Aug;38(4):309-11.

PMID:
16916718
9.

Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.

Kvåle R, Møller B, Wahlqvist R, Fosså SD, Berner A, Busch C, Kyrdalen AE, Svindland A, Viset T, Halvorsen OJ.

BJU Int. 2009 Jun;103(12):1647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08255.x. Epub 2008 Dec 22.

PMID:
19154461
10.

Prostatic transition zone directed needle biopsies uncommonly sample clinically relevant transition zone tumors.

Haarer CF, Gopalan A, Tickoo SK, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Reuter VE, Fine SW.

J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.042. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

PMID:
19683261
11.

Correlation of periacinar retraction clefting in needle core biopsies and corresponding prostatectomy specimens of patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Kruslin B, Tomas D, Rogatsch H, Reljić A, Vucić M, Balicević D, Belicza M, Mikuz G.

Int J Surg Pathol. 2005 Jan;13(1):67-72.

PMID:
15735857
12.

Histology of specimens taken by prostatectomy and needle biopsy.

Ngugi PM, Byakika B.

East Afr Med J. 2007 Aug;84(8):363-6.

PMID:
17970003
14.

Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.

Makary MA, Epstein J, Pronovost PJ, Millman EA, Hartmann EC, Freischlag JA.

Surgery. 2007 Apr;141(4):450-5. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

PMID:
17383521
15.

Errors in histological grading by prostatic needle biopsy specimens: frequency and predisposing factors.

Ruijter E, van Leenders G, Miller G, Debruyne F, van de Kaa C.

J Pathol. 2000 Oct;192(2):229-33.

PMID:
11004700
16.

A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.

Fine SW, Epstein JI.

J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.057. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

PMID:
18289601
17.

Recutting prostate needle core biopsies with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia increases detection of adenocarcinoma.

Rapp DE, Msezane LP, Reynolds WS, Lotan TL, Obara P, O'Connor RC, Taxy JB, Gerber GS, Zagaja GP.

Can J Urol. 2009 Feb;16(1):4484-9.

PMID:
19222887
18.

Intensifying the saturation biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies: a step in the wrong direction.

Simon J, Kuefer R, Bartsch G Jr, Volkmer BG, Hautmann RE, Gottfried HW.

BJU Int. 2008 Aug;102(4):459-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07560.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

PMID:
18325061
19.

Gleason score as predictor of clinicopathologic findings and biochemical (PSA) progression following radical prostatectomy.

Guimaraes MS, Quintal MM, Meirelles LR, Magna LA, Ferreira U, Billis A.

Int Braz J Urol. 2008 Jan-Feb;34(1):23-9.

20.

A clinicopathologic study of preoperative and postoperative findings with minute Gleason 3+3=6 cancer at radical prostatectomy.

Osunkoya AO, Carter HB, Epstein JI.

Urology. 2008 Sep;72(3):638-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

PMID:
18400278
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk