Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 477

1.
3.

The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.

Butler BM, Moran G.

Law Hum Behav. 2002 Apr;26(2):175-84.

PMID:
11985297
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.
5.

Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.

Montgomery JH, Ciccone JR, Garvey SP, Eisenberg T.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(4):509-18.

PMID:
16394228
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.

Leippe MR, Eisenstadt D, Rauch SM, Seib HM.

J Appl Psychol. 2004 Jun;89(3):524-41.

PMID:
15161410
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.

Krauss DA, Lieberman JD, Olson J.

Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(6):801-22.

PMID:
15568199
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.

Beck JC.

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(4):453-63.

PMID:
8054675
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Reasoning about scientific evidence: effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case.

Kovera MB, McAuliff BD, Hebert KS.

J Appl Psychol. 1999 Jun;84(3):362-75.

PMID:
10380417
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Psychiatry and the death penalty: dilemma for mental health professionals.

Kermani EJ, Drob SL.

Psychiatr Q. 1988 Fall;59(3):193-212. Review.

PMID:
3070607
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Commentary: Pursuing justice in death penalty trials.

Watson C, Eth S, Leong GB.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(1):50-4.

PMID:
22396341
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials.

Barnett ME, Brodsky SL, Davis CM.

Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(6):751-70.

PMID:
15386561
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Commentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases.

Edersheim JG, Beck JC.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(4):519-22. Review.

PMID:
16394229
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Law & psychiatry. Death, the expert witness, and the dangers of going Barefoot.

Appelbaum PS.

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;34(11):1003-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
6642443
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.

Neal TM, Guadagno RE, Eno CA, Brodsky SL.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(4):488-97.

PMID:
23233470
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive-experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony.

Lieberman JD, Krauss DA, Kyger M, Lehoux M.

Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(4):507-26.

PMID:
17620274
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Psychiatry and the death penalty.

Scott CL.

Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006 Sep;29(3):791-804. Review.

PMID:
16904512
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness.

Krauss DA, Lee DH.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2003 Mar-Apr;26(2):113-37. No abstract available.

PMID:
12581750
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?

Brodsky SL, Neal TM, Cramer RJ, Ziemke MH.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(4):525-32.

PMID:
20019000
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction.

Simon D, Snow CJ, Read SJ.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jun;86(6):814-37.

PMID:
15149257
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk