Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 225

1.
2.
3.

Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646. Review. Erratum in: J Dairy Sci. 2009 Mar;92(3):1313.

PMID:
19164653
4.

A practical approach for minimising inbreeding and maximising genetic gain in dairy cattle.

Haile-Mariam M, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME.

Genet Sel Evol. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(4):369-89. Epub 2007 Jul 6.

6.

Genome wide signatures of positive selection: the comparison of independent samples and the identification of regions associated to traits.

Barendse W, Harrison BE, Bunch RJ, Thomas MB, Turner LB.

BMC Genomics. 2009 Apr 24;10:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-178.

7.

Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel.

Khatkar MS, Nicholas FW, Collins AR, Zenger KR, Cavanagh JA, Barris W, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Raadsma HW.

BMC Genomics. 2008 Apr 24;9:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-187.

8.

Linkage disequilibrium in the North American Holstein population.

Kim ES, Kirkpatrick BW.

Anim Genet. 2009 Jun;40(3):279-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01831.x. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

PMID:
19220233
9.
10.

Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.

de Roos AP, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF, van Arendonk JA.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Mar;94(3):1559-67. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3354.

PMID:
21338821
11.

Genetic diversity and population structure of American Red Angus cattle.

Márquez GC, Speidel SE, Enns RM, Garrick DJ.

J Anim Sci. 2010 Jan;88(1):59-68. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1292. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

12.

An assessment of population structure in eight breeds of cattle using a whole genome SNP panel.

McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, Crews D, Dias Neto E, Gill CA, Gao C, Mannen H, Wang Z, Van Tassell CP, Williams JL, Taylor JF, Moore SS.

BMC Genet. 2008 May 20;9:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-37.

13.

Genetic characterization of the Burlina cattle breed using microsatellites markers.

Dalvit C, De Marchi M, Dal Zotto R, Zanetti E, Meuwissen T, Cassandro M.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2008 Apr;125(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00707.x.

PMID:
18363979
14.

Genome-wide assessment of worldwide chicken SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles in commercial breeds.

Muir WM, Wong GK, Zhang Y, Wang J, Groenen MA, Crooijmans RP, Megens HJ, Zhang H, Okimoto R, Vereijken A, Jungerius A, Albers GA, Lawley CT, Delany ME, MacEachern S, Cheng HH.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 11;105(45):17312-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806569105. Epub 2008 Nov 3.

15.

Effect of sire mating patterns on future genetic merit and inbreeding in a closed beef cattle population.

Oyama K, Nojima M, Shojo M, Fukushima M, Anada K, Mukai F.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Apr;124(2):73-80.

PMID:
17488357
16.
17.
18.

Brief introduction to whole-genome selection in cattle using single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Seidel GE.

Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22(1):138-44. doi: 10.1071/RD09220. Review.

PMID:
20003856
19.

Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.

Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW, Hayes BJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Nov;93(11):5455-66. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3256.

PMID:
20965361
20.

Inbreeding trends and application of optimized selection in the UK Holstein population.

Kearney JF, Wall E, Villanueva B, Coffey MP.

J Dairy Sci. 2004 Oct;87(10):3503-9.

PMID:
15377628
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk