Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 660

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 17198346)

1.

Automated interpretation of PET/CT images in patients with lung cancer.

Gutte H, Jakobsson D, Olofsson F, Ohlsson M, Valind S, Loft A, Edenbrandt L, Kjaer A.

Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Feb;28(2):79-84.

PMID:
17198346
2.

Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions?

Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, Van Damme N, Van Huysse J, Berrevoet F, De Vos M, Duyck P, Peeters M.

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2007 Oct-Dec;70(4):331-8.

PMID:
18330088
3.
4.

An independent evaluation of a new method for automated interpretation of lung scintigrams using artificial neural networks.

Holst H, Måre K, Järund A, Aström K, Evander E, Tägil K, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L.

Eur J Nucl Med. 2001 Jan;28(1):33-8.

PMID:
11202449
5.

Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans.

Sadik M, Hamadeh I, Nordblom P, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L.

J Nucl Med. 2008 Dec;49(12):1958-65. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055061. Epub 2008 Nov 7.

6.

STIR turbo SE MR imaging vs. coregistered FDG-PET/CT: quantitative and qualitative assessment of N-stage in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Yoshikawa T, Yoshimura M, Ohbayashi C, Sugimura K.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;26(4):1071-80.

PMID:
17896365
7.

Correction of oral contrast artifacts in CT-based attenuation correction of PET images using an automated segmentation algorithm.

Ahmadian A, Ay MR, Bidgoli JH, Sarkar S, Zaidi H.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Oct;35(10):1812-23. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0756-7. Epub 2008 Apr 17.

PMID:
18418597
8.

Coregistered FDG PET/CT-based textural characterization of head and neck cancer for radiation treatment planning.

Yu H, Caldwell C, Mah K, Mozeg D.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Mar;28(3):374-83. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004425.

PMID:
19244009
9.

A new computer-based decision-support system for the interpretation of bone scans.

Sadik M, Jakobsson D, Olofsson F, Ohlsson M, Suurkula M, Edenbrandt L.

Nucl Med Commun. 2006 May;27(5):417-23.

PMID:
16609352
10.
11.

PET recognition of pulmonary metastases on PET/CT imaging: impact of attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected PET images.

Reinhardt MJ, Wiethoelter N, Matthies A, Joe AY, Strunk H, Jaeger U, Biersack HJ.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Feb;33(2):134-9. Epub 2005 Sep 29.

PMID:
16193313
12.

Usefulness of a breath-holding acquisition method in PET/CT for pulmonary lesions.

Yamaguchi T, Ueda O, Hara H, Sakai H, Kida T, Suzuki K, Adachi S, Ishii K.

Ann Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;23(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0206-4. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

PMID:
19205840
13.

Usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of pancreatic metastases from lung cancer.

Sato M, Okumura T, Kaito K, Kiyoshima M, Asato Y, Uchiumi K, Iijima H, Hashimoto I, Kaburagi T, Amemiya R.

Ann Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;23(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0205-5. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

PMID:
19205838
14.

Accuracy of whole-body FDG-PET/CT for detecting brain metastases from non-central nervous system tumors.

Kitajima K, Nakamoto Y, Okizuka H, Onishi Y, Senda M, Suganuma N, Sugimura K.

Ann Nucl Med. 2008 Aug;22(7):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0145-0. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

PMID:
18756362
15.

Software-based fusion of PET and CT images for suspected recurrent lung cancer.

Nakamoto Y, Senda M, Okada T, Sakamoto S, Saga T, Higashi T, Togashi K.

Mol Imaging Biol. 2008 May-Jun;10(3):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s11307-008-0131-x. Epub 2008 Feb 22.

PMID:
18293042
16.

Performance of integrated FDG-PET/CT for differentiating benign and malignant lung lesions--results from a large prospective clinical trial.

Pauls S, Buck AK, Halter G, Mottaghy FM, Muche R, Bluemel C, Gerstner S, Krüger S, Glatting G, Sunder-Plassmann L, Möller P, Brambs HJ, Reske SN.

Mol Imaging Biol. 2008 Mar-Apr;10(2):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s11307-007-0129-9. Epub 2008 Jan 16. Erratum in: Mol Imaging Biol. 2008 May-Jun;10(3):176.

PMID:
18204955
17.

Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions.

Kim SK, Allen-Auerbach M, Goldin J, Fueger BJ, Dahlbom M, Brown M, Czernin J, Schiepers C.

J Nucl Med. 2007 Feb;48(2):214-20.

18.

The additional value of CT images interpretation in the differential diagnosis of benign vs. malignant primary bone lesions with 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Strobel K, Exner UE, Stumpe KD, Hany TF, Bode B, Mende K, Veit-Haibach P, von Schulthess GK, Hodler J.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Nov;35(11):2000-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0876-0. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

PMID:
18712385
19.

Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.

Degirmenci B, Wilson D, Laymon CM, Becker C, Mason NS, Bencherif B, Agarwal A, Luketich J, Landreneau R, Avril N.

Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Jul;29(7):614-22. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f9b5a0.

PMID:
18528183
20.

Role of computed tomography and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography image fusion in conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with standard techniques with and without elective nodal irradiation.

Ceresoli GL, Cattaneo GM, Castellone P, Rizzos G, Landoni C, Gregorc V, Calandrino R, Villa E, Messa C, Santoro A, Fazio F.

Tumori. 2007 Jan-Feb;93(1):88-96.

PMID:
17455878
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk