Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 219

1.

Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.

Grant DS.

Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):209-16. Epub 2006 Oct 31.

PMID:
17079092
2.

Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.

Grant DS.

Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):139-48. Epub 2006 Feb 14.

PMID:
16481126
3.

Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.

Talarico DC, Grant DS.

Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):98-106. Epub 2005 Aug 10.

PMID:
16095850
4.

Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.

Oliveira L, Machado A.

Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.021. Epub 2009 Jan 4.

PMID:
19162143
5.

Choose-long errors at delays shorter than the training delay persist when enhanced between-trial summation of duration memories are precluded in pigeons.

Grant DS.

Behav Processes. 2009 Nov;82(3):335-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

PMID:
19683036
6.

Effects of delays on human performance on a temporal discrimination procedure: evidence of a choose-short effect.

Lieving LM, Lane SD, Cherek DR, Tcheremissine OV.

Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):135-43. Epub 2005 Nov 9.

PMID:
16289517
7.

The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.

Aum S, Brown BL, Hemmes NS.

Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):187-97. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

PMID:
17157998
8.

Temporal discrimination learning by pigeons.

Zentall TR.

Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):286-92. Epub 2006 Oct 1. Review.

PMID:
17110057
9.
10.

Processing of empty and filled time intervals in pigeons.

Grant DS, Talarico DC.

Learn Behav. 2004 Nov;32(4):477-90.

PMID:
15825888
11.

Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.

Fetterman JG, MacEwen D.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):311-24.

13.

Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.

Urcuioli PJ, DeMarse TB, Lionello KM.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Nov;72(3):279-97.

14.

Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.

Machado A, Vasconcelos M.

Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):172-87. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

PMID:
16343806
15.

Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes: reliance on temporal properties and evidence for delay interval/gap confusion.

Santi A, Lellwitz J, Gagne S.

Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):128-38. Epub 2006 Feb 13.

PMID:
16473481
16.
17.

Disruption of temporal discrimination and the choose-short effect.

Ward RD, Odum AL.

Learn Behav. 2007 Feb;35(1):60-70.

PMID:
17557392
18.

Choice based on exclusion in pigeons.

Clement TS, Zentall TR.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):959-64.

PMID:
15000545
19.
20.

Control of pigeons' matching-to-sample performance by differential sample response requirements.

Hogan DE, Zentall TR, Pace G.

Am J Psychol. 1983 Spring;96(1):37-49.

PMID:
6859346
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk