Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 106

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 17057064)

1.

Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization.

Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB.

Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):355-65.

PMID:
17057064
2.

Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators.

Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL; ACRIN 6666 Investigators.

Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):693-702. Epub 2006 Apr 26.

PMID:
16641344
3.

Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.

Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Park JH, Lee KE, Kim JH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):747-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5841.

PMID:
21862820
4.

[Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].

Fischer T, Filimonow S, Hamm B, Slowinski T, Thomas A.

Rofo. 2006 Dec;178(12):1224-34. German.

PMID:
17136646
5.

Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.

Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Lee JY, Kang DR, Oh KK.

Eur J Radiol. 2008 Feb;65(2):293-8. Epub 2007 May 24.

PMID:
17531417
6.

BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.

Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS.

Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):385-91. Epub 2006 Mar 28.

PMID:
16569780
7.

Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.

Berg WA, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB.

Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):673-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122251. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

8.

US-guided diffuse optical tomography for breast lesions: the reliability of clinical experience.

Kim MJ, Kim JY, Youn JH, Kim MH, Koo HR, Kim SJ, Sohn YM, Moon HJ, Kim EK.

Eur Radiol. 2011 Jul;21(7):1353-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2060-3. Epub 2011 Jan 28.

PMID:
21274716
9.

Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.

Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E.

Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):665-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523080670. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

PMID:
19567644
10.

Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations.

Chang JM, Cha JH, Park JS, Kim SJ, Moon WK.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Oct 3. pii: 0284185114551565. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25280476
11.

Ultrasonographic assessment of breast density.

Kim WH, Moon WK, Kim SJ, Yi A, Yun BL, Cho N, Chang JM, Koo HR, Kim MY, Bae MS, Lee SH, Kim JY, Lee EH.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):851-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2506-1. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

PMID:
23568482
12.

Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging.

Cha JH, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SM, Park SH, Han BK, Choe YH, Park JM, Im JG.

Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):63-9. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

PMID:
17090709
13.

Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.

Giess CS, Smeglin LZ, Meyer JE, Ritner JA, Birdwell RL.

J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Dec;31(12):1943-9.

14.

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.

Cha JH, Moon WK, Cho N, Chung SY, Park SH, Park JM, Han BK, Choe YH, Cho G, Im JG.

Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):841-6.

PMID:
16304106
15.

Complex cystic lesions of the breast on ultrasonography: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment.

Hsu HH, Yu JC, Lee HS, Lin WC, Chang WC, Tung HJ, Huang GS, Hsu GC.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.037. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

PMID:
20116191
16.

Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.

Zhang J, Lai XJ, Zhu QL, Wang HY, Jiang YX, Liu H, Dai Q, You SS, Xiao MS, Sun Q.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

PMID:
21724355
17.

Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms.

Drukker K, Giger ML, Metz CE.

Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):834-40. Erratum in: Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):320.

PMID:
16304105
18.

Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.

Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE.

Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):59-69. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

PMID:
22723501
19.

Benign papilloma without atypia diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: clinical and US features predictive of upgrade to malignancy.

Youk JH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Park BW, Kim SI.

Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):81-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100728. Epub 2010 Oct 22.

PMID:
20971773
20.

Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography.

Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):59-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101414. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

PMID:
21330569
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk