Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 189

1.

Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.

Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Ward HA.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):735-46. Review.

PMID:
16958057
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Kuo R, Panchal M, Tanenbaum L, Crues JV 3rd.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):245-61. Review.

PMID:
17260407
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa: a comparative study of t2-weighted spin-echo sequences at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla.

Fischbach F, Müller M, Bruhn H.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Apr;49(3):358-63. doi: 10.1080/02841850701824127.

PMID:
18365827
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

[Suppression of CSF artifact in fast FLAIR sequence at 3.0 Tesla].

Fujiwara Y, Ishimori Y, Yamaguchi I, Matsuda T, Miyati T, Kimura H.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Dec 20;64(12):1513-21. Japanese.

PMID:
19151520
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Myelin water imaging: Implementation and development at 3.0T and comparison to 1.5T measurements.

Kolind SH, Mädler B, Fischer S, Li DK, MacKay AL.

Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jul;62(1):106-15. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21966.

PMID:
19353659
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

A modified view ordering for artifact reduction in MRI.

Maclaren JR, Bones PJ, Millane RP, Watts R.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:2053-6.

PMID:
18002390
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Characterizing radial undersampling artifacts for cardiac applications.

Peters DC, Rohatgi P, Botnar RM, Yeon SB, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ.

Magn Reson Med. 2006 Feb;55(2):396-403.

PMID:
16408266
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies.

Dietrich O, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO.

Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jan;65(1):29-35. Epub 2007 Dec 26. Review.

PMID:
18162353
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

[Progress of studies for reduction of ghost artifact in magnetic resonance imaging].

Chen C, Tao H, Wang S, Luo L.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Apr;24(2):457-9. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
17591281
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.

Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):17-26. Review.

PMID:
16530632
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Advances of 3T MR imaging in visualizing trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus are partially SNR-independent: analysis using simulated noise in relation to micro-CT, 1.5T MRI, and biomechanical strength.

Bauer JS, Monetti R, Krug R, Matsuura M, Mueller D, Eckstein F, Rummeny EJ, Lochmueller EM, Raeth CW, Link TM.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jan;29(1):132-40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21625.

PMID:
19097112
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Water excitation MPRAGE: an alternative sequence for postcontrast imaging of the abdomen in noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla MRI.

Altun E, Semelka RC, Dale BM, Elias J Jr.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):1146-54. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21346.

PMID:
18425826
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

A method to reduce the Gibbs ringing artifact in MRI scans while keeping tissue boundary integrity.

Archibald R, Gelb A.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Apr;21(4):305-19.

PMID:
12022619
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Three-dimensional anisotropy contrast periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (3DAC PROPELLER) on a 3.0T system: a new modality for routine clinical neuroimaging.

Nakada T, Matsuzawa H, Fujii Y, Takahashi H, Nishizawa M, Kwee IL.

J Neuroimaging. 2006 Jul;16(3):206-11.

PMID:
16808821
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

MR lymphangiography using dendrimer-based contrast agents: a comparison at 1.5T and 3.0T.

Hama Y, Bernardo M, Regino CA, Koyama Y, Brechbiel MW, Krishna MC, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H.

Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):431-6.

PMID:
17260373
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Magnetic resonance imaging image intensity correction with extrapolation and adaptive smoothing.

Cheng H, Huang F.

Magn Reson Med. 2006 Apr;55(4):959-66.

PMID:
16526014
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Concomitant gradient field effects in balanced steady-state free precession.

Sica CT, Meyer CH.

Magn Reson Med. 2007 Apr;57(4):721-30.

PMID:
17390357
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.

Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB.

Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jan;65(1):15-28. Review.

PMID:
18077119
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

SMASH and SENSE: experimental and numerical comparisons.

Madore B, Pelc NJ.

Magn Reson Med. 2001 Jun;45(6):1103-11.

PMID:
11378889
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

[Feasibilities and limitations of high field parallel MRI].

Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Müller M, Breuer F, Blaimer M, Kiefer B, Schmitt M, Jakob PM.

Radiologe. 2004 Jan;44(1):49-55. German.

PMID:
14740094
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk