Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 193

1.

Another look at interpreting risk categories.

Mossman D.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Jan;18(1):41-63. Review.

PMID:
16639536
2.

Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?

Hanson RK.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Oct;18(4):343-55.

PMID:
17136627
3.

Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.

Looman J.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Apr;18(2):193-206.

PMID:
16598660
4.

Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.

Bengtson S, Långström N.

Sex Abuse. 2007 Jun;19(2):135-53. Epub 2007 May 30.

PMID:
17534713
5.
6.

Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders.

Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Oct;18(4):423-40.

PMID:
17136625
7.
8.

[Evaluation of risk assessment instruments for sex offenders].

Stadtland C, Hollweg M, Kleindienst N, Dietl J, Reich U, Nedopil N.

Nervenarzt. 2006 May;77(5):587-95. German.

PMID:
15965760
9.

The factor structure of static actuarial items: its relation to prediction.

Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Apr;18(2):207-26.

PMID:
16937082
10.

Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.

Kingston DA, Yates PM, Firestone P, Babchishin K, Bradford JM.

Sex Abuse. 2008 Dec;20(4):466-84. doi: 10.1177/1079063208325206. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

PMID:
18840901
11.

A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.

Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL, Lalumière ML, Boer D, Lang C.

Psychol Assess. 2003 Sep;15(3):413-25.

PMID:
14593842
12.

Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.

Bartosh DL, Garby T, Lewis D, Gray S.

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2003 Aug;47(4):422-38.

PMID:
12971183
13.

Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders.

Firestone P, Nunes KL, Moulden H, Broom I, Bradford JM.

Arch Sex Behav. 2005 Jun;34(3):277-83.

PMID:
15971010
14.

Sexual recidivism in sex offenders.

Greenberg DM.

Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;43(5):459-65. Review.

PMID:
9653528
15.

The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.

Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE.

Psychol Assess. 2009 Mar;21(1):1-21. doi: 10.1037/a0014421.

PMID:
19290762
16.

Comparison of measures of risk for recidivism in sexual offenders.

Looman J, Abracen J.

J Interpers Violence. 2010 May;25(5):791-807. doi: 10.1177/0886260509336961. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

PMID:
19571251
17.

Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.

Wollert R, Cramer E, Waggoner J, Skelton A, Vess J.

Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):471-90. doi: 10.1177/1079063210384633.

PMID:
21098823
18.

Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.

Meijer EH, Verschuere B, Merckelbach HL, Crombez G.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):423-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 11. Review.

PMID:
18789528
19.
20.

The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups.

Janka C, Gallasch-Nemitz F, Biedermann J, Dahle KP.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 May-Jun;35(3):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

PMID:
22425764
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk